I live off the beaten path off container traffic. Last weekend, we went on another college tour, which sent us through Omaha. North of Omaha, I saw a double stack train of perhaps 30-40 cars, going north on UP with 2 locomotives. There was a grain/tank train about 10-15 minutes ahead of it, and a mixed train about 10-15 minutes behind it. All seemed to be going about the same speed.
I always envision a double stack train as being very long, in order to maximize the economy of the setup. Was this train something out of the ordinary?
When you say 30-40 cars, do you mean car = articulated multi-platform or car = one platform (or well). There is a difference if you mean 60-80 containers or 350 containers. 60 containers is a slow day, 350 is an average day in some traffic lanes. (like by my house)
You say north from Omaha. Do you mean the Chicago- North Platte line or a UP line between Omaha and the Twin Cities? If it was going to, or coming from the Twin Cities then it would probably bel a smaller train than an east-west train like LA to Chicago.
The Union Pacific doesn’t offer container or trailer intermodal in either Minnesota or Wisconsin. I regard this as bad marketing because they have underutilized lines in those states and they could use intermodal to fill up their network. However, the Union Paciic doesn’t much care what I think.
They do operate a RoadRailer train between Chicago and the Twin Cities as a Triple Crown extension service.
I’m in agreement with carknocker1. Traffic decline is severe.
It might also be completely normal for this train. Or, abnormal for this train and due to a light day at the dock – traffic presented to the railroad will fluctuate quite a bit for numerous reasons, but the schedule still has to be protected for the customers to whom committments have been made. Container traffic “ordinary” fluctuations include weather that delayed a ship, port interruptions for a broad variety of reasons at any place on a ship’s string, track maintenance windows, and day of the week. “Extraordinary” fluctuations include maintenance downtimes at a major customer’s plant (like a product changeover at an auto assembly plant), inventory periods at a major distribution center, and the like.
It’s pretty hard to see one train and make much out of it.
You see the same thing on the Montreal, Maine and Atlantic…only more so. Quite often you will see a general freight consist with two or three double stack container well cars thrown in. I guess the port of Saint John isn’t what it once was.
Thanks-that all makes sense. Is all container traffic generally shipped on a time commitment basis? I envisioned a railroad being able to pool traffic, at least a little bit, in order to fill the trains. What does a railroad do, on the day they only have 12 containers to ship?
I’m pretty sure part of it is that the Adams Sub (Butler-Adams) doesn’t have double-stack clearances. Auto racks fit. The Adams line is also some of the last mainline stick rail anywhere on the UP system. To think they used to go 100 mph on it in the 1950s. Might be some of the same rail yet.
I am guessing you saw this train from I-29 on the Iowa side, just north of Council Bluffs. If correct, the train you saw was an eastbound by time table, although physically it’s headed north. There are a few stack trains that regularly set out cars at Council Bluffs. Usually they set out between 5 to 15 cars (counting each platform as a car) but once in a while one sets out quite a few more. I would bet that the one you saw had set out at CB.
Most class 1’s try to run point pairs as a dedicated train set to improve service and eliminate work events en route. In Omaha you could have seen a train going Chicago to/from Seattle, Portland, Lathrop, CA; Oakland; or LA. Depending on the day you saw it, if it was a WB train, it might have been Saturday’s traffic, headed to say Lathrop. Probably a small train.
The RR publishes what days of week they have cut-offs for each origin-destination pair. They try to depart trains on that day (within approx 6-12 hrs of cut-off) in order to provide predictable service to the customer.
OK, this is further proof that railroads are not marketing companies. One size, or type of service, does not fit all customers.
I can see the 8:00 AM meeting.
Q. What should we do about intermodal service to the Twin Cities?
A. We can’t do anything, we can’t run double stacks up there.
Q. Well, that’s settled. Where should we go for lunch?
It’s a rail line with excess capacity on a system otherwise strained for capacity. That makes it an opportunity that can be exploited quickly. It doesn’t need to handle double stacks. Single the containers on spine cars or T 'em up. (Meaning: Put them on a chassis and run as TOFC) Find a way to use the asset (underutilized line) to make money.
Other companies understand market segmentation. Railroads seem to only want to do one thing and make their customers fit into their “one size fits all” concept.
Nothing new here. “We have the boxcar, and you can just make your traffic fit it.” (or simillar) - John G. Kneiling, Jr., M.E., P.E., the Professional Iconoclast, in various columns and articles in Trains in the 1960s, and the 1970s, and the 1980s . . .
Your first paragraph that I’ve quoted above also sounds like vintage JGK. You sure you haven’t been possessed by his supernatural spirit and are now “channeling” him ? [;)]
Which is why the 3rd party logistics (“3PL”) companies such as Pacer International / Stacktrain - http://www.pacer.com/ - can exist & make out OK - not great at the moment, but OK.
With respect to the comments on UP running stack trains to/from the Twin Cities and Wisconsin points, the implication of some of the notes is that there is a market there that UP is simply (and ignorantly) ignoring.
I don’t know what UP has looked at in this corridor, but it strikes me that this is not a place where customers would necessarily be beating a path to their doorstep if they did offer the service. UP’s routings between the West Coast to the Twin Cities and Wisconsin are circuitous and (in the case of the Mankato sub) slow. BNSF’s route structure undoubtedly permits it to offer a much superior service between this area from the West Coast than anything UP could offer, particularly from ports in the PNW. And both BNSF and CP probably have superior lines from the east as well. While UP could conceivably upgrade its own Chicago-Twin Cities line to be a competitive stack train routing to/from the east (after all, it was a very competitive passenger routing), the question for UP would be whether the revenue they would gain warrants the investment. I suspect they feel that it wouldn’t generate enough additional traffic to justify the investment. They may also feel that, from the standpoint of their bottom line, it’s better for any Twin Cities or Wisconsin stack traffic they handle to go by highway to/from their existing container terminals rather than make the investment needed to allow it to move by rail to/from the Twin Cities area.
I’d like to agree with you here Falcon48. I’d like to believe that the UP has made a thorough study of the Twin Cities intermodal market, keeps the study up to date, and has inteligently decided to take a pass. Unfortunately, my experience tells me that isn’t so. (I don’t know first hand, I’m just going from my experience.)
First, customers beating a path to your door is nice.