I think this is an indication of how difficult it is to run passenger service on freight tracks. But the worst is the CN (IC & GM&O).
I think it’s clear from the numbers what CNs priorities are. It will be interesting what the STB does about it.
CN’s response:
A lot of stuff from the CN’s complaints does not paint Amtrak in a good light.
"As a result of Amtrak failing to properly fuel its locomotives, this has been a recurring
problem, particularly in the area of Champaign, IL. [For example, on September 4, 2011 Train
#58 (New Orleans to Chicago) was delayed for half an hour in Champaign while it was refueled
after it left Carbondale, IL, with insufficient fuel to make it to Chicago. Similarly, on July 5,
2011, Train #391 (Chicago to Carbondale) ran out of fuel on a single-track segment just south of
Delrey (between Chicago and Champaign), causing more than 15 hours of delay to itself, another
Amtrak train, and four freight trains. "
" In the Chicago area, where the need to coordinate operations between railroads is
especially compelling, Amtrak has failed to join CN and most of the other freight railroads in
efforts to implement the Common Operational Picture (“COP”), a train monitoring system that
provides information about operations on multiple carriers. Through the use of secure Internet
connections, this system is designed to receive data from the computer-aided dispatching
systems of the participating railroads, convert them to a commonly-accessible format, and
provide participating railroads’ dispatchers (again through secure Internet connections) with a
graphic display, visible on computer monitors, laptops, or other screens, of track occupancies,
track authorities (i.e., clearances for trains to proceed), switches, signal lamps, location names,
and train IDs on the lines of multiple railroads.
In declining to participate in COP, Amtrak has ignored the potential that this program
offers to provide information th
[quote user=“n012944”]
"As a result of Amtrak failing to properly fuel its locomotives, this has been a recurring
problem, particularly in the area of Champaign, IL. [For example, on September 4, 2011 Train
#58 (New Orleans to Chicago) was delayed for half an hour in Champaign while it was refueled
after it left Carbondale, IL, with insufficient fuel to make it to Chicago. Similarly, on July 5,
2011, Train #391 (Chicago to Carbondale) ran out of fuel on a single-track segment just south of
Delrey (between Chicago and Champaign), causing more than 15 hours of delay to itself, another
Amtrak train, and four freight trains. "
Absolutely no excuse for running out of fuel!
" In the Chicago area, where the need to coordinate operations between railroads is
especially compelling, Amtrak has failed to join CN and most of the other freight railroads in
efforts to implement the Common Operational Picture (“COP”), a train monitoring system that
provides information about operations on multiple carriers. Through the use of secure Internet
connections, this system is designed to receive data from the computer-aided dispatching
systems of the participating railroads, convert them to a commonly-accessible format, and
provide participating railroads’ dispatchers (again through secure Internet connections) with a
graphic display, visible on computer monitors, laptops, or other screens, of track occupancies,
track authorities (i.e., clearances for trains to proceed), switches, signal lamps, location names,
and train IDs on the lines of multiple railroads.
In declining to participate in COP, Amtrak has ignored the potential that this program
offers to provide information th
But IC abandoned much of their racetrack, double track, and cab signals in the 1990s by pushing Amtrak and FRA. Now their freight traffic is up and its all Amtrak’s fault ? Many of the improvements CN proposes is restoration of double track.
Here is the question, could the railroad operate as a single track railroad fluidly is Amtrak was not on the route? If the answer is yes, then yes Amtrak should have to pick up the costs to make it fluid for its own traffic.
It’s a valid point but I wonder why you seem to think CN and other roads are always in the right with regard to ATK and community and safety issues?
I never said anyone is always right, except myself of course[;)]
CN and IC or should I say Mr Harrison has a history of lifting double track on both the IC and CN and then having to replace it a future in favour of short term profits. When he was CEO of CN he ordered the lifting of double track on sections of main line track between Edmonton and Jasper, Hamilton and Niagara Falls and then sent the track to the US to repair the damage he had done to IC. As a former shareholder of CN I must say that VIA and Amtrak should not have to pay for additional infrastructure unless it is for trackage that is to be used by them exclusively. They should pay higher access charges for track that is maintained at above 55 - 60 mph. They should only have to pay for infrastructure if they are increasing the frequency above a certain limit. The daily City of New Orleans which represents most of the route between Chicago and New Orleans can hardly be seen as a major impediment to freight traffic.
The problem with funding private railway infrastructure is that improvements are generally taken
Cannot see how 3 trains per day in each direction (Chicago - Carbondale), and one on the whole line can be the source of such a war. Yet the cases presented by CN seem to be a source of porblems, but maybe not the only one.
Now one thing I do not u nderstand is the ‘single tracking’ strategy. Not only the lines in cause loose capacuty, but maybe it’s not a sound strategy, since trains will loose more time crawling in and out of the sidings, and consume maybe more fuel trying to get back to track speed. Where are the economies, even in the short term? Single track + slower trains = less reliable service+more fuel consumtion, less capacity and worse service to shippers. Maybe all that downsizing had costs that are still being paid, and will be more if eventaully capacity isto be restored to the previous standard.
The days of 80 Mph average speeds with passenger trains (between Effingham and Centralia) are long gone … and of course, without cab signal security levels are maybe reduced. Just my 2 cents
For the IC, the savings were on track maintenance. Short-term, of course
Not being in the US to actually see how today’s American railroading is done, you aren’t in position to see the 9000+ foot freight trains with 10K to 20K tons of freight. From a dispatching perspective, you would not believe how hard it can be to ‘part the waters’ amongst the priority, non-priority, bulk commodity and local switcher freight trains that occupy today’s railroads. American freight railroading is similar to European freight railroading only in the characterization ‘freight railroad’.
While I cannot condone CN’s handling of Amtrak, I can understand their operating practices as distasteful as they are to Amtrak and Amtrak’s customers.
Part of the complaint comes from CN’s dispatch performance the past 12 months. CN has led (worse ) almost every month including this FEB. If the delays on this short segment were eliminated then CN would go from worse to first. Just to be fair CN lowered the delays this past FEB almost in half from the earlier complaint. ( per Amtrak FEB performance report ).