I have to agree with traisessive 1 about Exira to Caye on the Rivers Sub. I think I am wrong with my choice of west from Portage is wrong but that’s what I put down.
I like Dudes idea of a second bridge at Natress but can’t see it happening either.
I also like Dudes idea of Galloway to Hargwen and giving a nice section of 2 tracks from Bickerdike West (or east) to Dalehurst of 33 miles.
Going by what is happening now they really need this.
It would not surprise me if the double track extension south of Superior, WI starts just east of the Bluff Creek bridge near Ambridge and ends just north of the Amnicon River bridge near Rockmont.
Double track currently starts just south of the Amnicon River bridge, and the additional double track north of there would allow for one train heading south out of Pokegama Yard to get a run for the climb up the Niagara escarpment while a northbound is able to stay in the clear north of the Amnicon River bridge while heading in for a crew change at Pokegama Yard.
Pokegama Yard is at 686 feet of elevation and Hawthorne is at 1,178 feet of elevation so it is a hefty pull.
CN has announced 345 Million Cdn$ capital investment in BC Planned expansion projects that will improve traffic fluidity in the Port of Prince Rupert and Port of Vancouver areas include:
Construction of a new train passing siding in Port Edward;
Construction of 2.5 miles of double track west of Prince George;
and, Multi-year initiatives to increase capacity at the Port of Vancouver in collaboration with the Government of Canada and the Vancouver Fraser Port Authority.
Maintenance program highlights include:
Replacement of approximately 115 miles of rail;
Installation of more than 210,000 new railroad ties;
Rebuilds of 38 road crossing surfaces; and, Other maintenance work on culverts, signal systems and additional track infrastructure.
CN’s B.C. rail network serves the West Coast gateways of Vancouver and Prince Rupert and major inland terminals in Surrey, Prince George, Kamloops, and Fort Nelson.
It would be wonderful if CN would do something about the very rough single track line from Chicago south it acquired from IC. Mr. Harrison had already done his track removal by the time it became CN. Is it not sad that passenger travel on this line is slower than in the last days of steam. Of course the roadbed in general and the diamonds in particular were better maintained.
I am not familiar at all with Superior and area. I appreciate the posts by kgbw49 and the detail he puts in it.
I bought a 2019 CTG (Canadian Trackside Guide) and the only DT listed on the Superior Sub is from Mission Creek to South Steelton. Kgbw49 said it was definitely done from Hawthorne north of the Amnicon River bridge in 2018. Are there any milepost mileages for this? How long is this stretch?
I have looked at Google maps, it is a very rugged area with a lot of bridges and rail lines and hard for me to figure out.
They rather ambiguously mentioned “capacity improvements” in and around Vancouver and the ports there.
Materials have started to arrive for the construction projects, sometimes well in advance of when they are really needed. As an example, the brand new prefabricated 45 mph turnouts for Entrance, Niton and Leaman, AB showed up riding flatcars and gondolas a couple weeks ago. A nice sight and smell, there’s nothing quite like fresh creosote!
That’s great. Thank you. I am very surprised about that double-track section as I thought that was a siding which was difficult to be extended, especially by another five miles. Upon looking on Google Earth, it didn’t actually look so bad. Do you also know if the sidings at Niton and Leaman will be integrated into the 12 mile double-track section?
CN’s practice is to convert existing sidings into parts of the double track section, may as well use up as much pre-built grade and track as possible. The vast majority of our sidings are already laid with heavy, welded rail, and many have already been upgraded for 25 mph instead of 15. Many of the double track sections that have been constructed over the past 10 years have connected two sidings.
As it exists right now, the siding at Entrance is about 6500’ long, which makes it almost useless in today’s world of long trains. Between the ends of double track at Dalehurst and Park Gate the only places for long trains to meet are Hinton and Swan Landing, both of which are regularly clogged by trains stopping to switch. Extending Entrance to 5 miles would allow two long trains to be brought over there instead of waiting farther back.
One graphic has showed a siding extention near Fort Frances, Ontario. That is said to be connecting Fort Fracnes to the first siding west of it, Devlin.
The Manitoba and Ontario releases both say nothing about this. I doubt it’s going to actually happen.