Hello All,
To help better answer your question I have a few questions for you…
- Are you modeling or freelancing your plan on a prototypical line?
- Do you have a track plan we could see?
- Is this an around the wall plan?
- Multi-level?
- How deep?
- Minimum radii for the commuter line?
- Any peninsulas or other features/limitations of the space?
In urban areas stations can be blocks apart. In suburban or rural areas stations can be miles apart.
With that much space I would consider a semi-elevated trackage for the commuter rail.
In Denver, Colorado, the nearest city to me; with Amtrak passenger service, major freight and M.O.W. hub with an inter-urban system, all run on standard gage trackage.
Amtrak and the freight motive power are diesel and share the same trackage.
The inter-urban system is electric, run on catenary, and has proprietary trackage.
The inter-urban lines, when necessary, have fly-overs above the trackage of the BNSF trackage.
On my recent travels to Germany, Belgium, France and The Netherlands, commuter service was divided into high-speed rail and commuter-rail.
Most European stations incorporated all the modes of rail transport I have mentioned, in addition to metro (subway), tram and bus transportation hubs.
A semi-elevated separate commuter system would allow you to run commuter trains separate of the other traffic on your system.
If the focus of your pike is on commuter operations there are many decisions, that I have outlined, that need to be considered to make your pike satisfying to you.
A final thought…
John Allen on planning:
"A model railroad should probably start with a concept. Why? Because much knowledge about railraoding, experience in model railroading, and thought are required before a proper concept for a model railroad can be formed. These requirement