Look a little sunburned to me - actually - I am really quite fair- (well I try to be)
Now get off my case! [:X]
Mookie
thanks mookie for the picture.
stay safe
joe and matt
Mookie: I new that you would put your picture up! [:D]
Willy
My wife always kids me about falling for gals with glasses, but hey, you’re my kid sister!
I’m supposed to be at a family reunion tomorrow, so there should be cameras. We’ll see what we can come up with (they’ll probably get me doing my third-most-favorite pastime…eating!).
Mook-
I bet your photo was taken with a digital camera. Same effect on your photo as on the photo of Kathi Kube in her profile. Digital cameras just cannot get colors (especially fle***ones)accurate. Perhaps someday the colors will be correct. That’s why I stay with dependable slide film.
Otherwise, not considering the digital color-shift, LOOKIN’ GOOD!!
Way to go, Jenny…
Now all the procrastinaters are out of excuses.
By the way, tell your Ed this Ed said he has good taste.
Stay Frosty,[8D]
Ed
…Congratulations Jen for joining all of us in the photo posting…My mental picture was about 90% correct. Good picture.
Whoever still doesn’t have a picture up… better put one up soon!!
That pic is cool Jen.
Adrianspeeder
Oh, hey, Kevin how do those EMDs taste, I prefer ALCOs myself.
Hi Big Z,
Pop quiz time, if your game.
Lets see if you, and any one else who wants to play can get the answer.
Look at my profile photo then Jenny’s.
One is digital, one isnt.
Which is which?
By the way, there is a cheap and easy way to fix the color shift problem you speak of, it works just as well on digital as on film cameras.
Can anyone guess what it is?
Stay Frosty,
Ed
I will let you in on it at the end of the quiz.
Without messing up Ed’s contest, the picture had nice colors when it came into this building. It went through 3 people and this is how it turned out. So much for web-gods and color adjustment. And it was on this end, not Dave Voss’s doing. He just posted it for me!
Thanks for the compliment Ed - I really appreciate it! My Ed will too!
Jen
[/quote]
Best way I have found is to stay away from cameras, which I will now do!
Mookie
Well, I broke down and posted a photo…enjoy it guys…
LC
limitedclear, loved the photo, is this your everyday work cloths?[:D]
Hey, Limitedclear, if that was really you, better change your handle to “Restricted” or maybe just “Stop”.
By the way, you don’t happen to work midnight shift, do you?
Jen, hope you do not mind waiting for my picture. Thomas the Tank engine will be at the Illinios train museum in 2 weeks. I hope to get one with me and my boy’s in front of Thomas. (My wife refuses to join us on the grounds, she does not understand what we see in trains.)
TIM A
As you will note, I said I posted a photo, I never said it was a photo of ME. After all the “what does Mookie look like” stuff I figured it would be well received…
LC
Ed-
If memory serves, any color correction done to a photo will affect the entire photo. Perhaps there is a way to do just the skin tones using a photo editor, but I’d bet it would be a time-consuming task.
With film, if the type of film is correct for the intended use (daylight film for outdoors) there should be no need for correction (except for polarization). For indoor shooting under flourescent light with daylight film i use a FLD filter.
But digital just cannot do skin tones correctly. I have had many sales persons at many pro equipment stores try to sell me digital cameras. I always ask to see a representation of work done with digital, and I can ALWAYS tell the difference if there are people as the main or seconday subject. I probably could not tell the difference if, say, a train photo was taken digitally, unless I had a film image of the exact same scene. I’m sure someday soon digital will be good. And I really hope so! Film is so expensive!
BTW Ed, your photo was digital.
And Jenny’s photo?
Remember, you said it was digital.
Sure?
One of them was altered on a computer.
One is from film, one is digital.
By the way, I work outdoors 8 to 10 hours a day, and am ruddy colored to begin with.
I own a Cannon F1 35mm I bought in the 70s, along with more lens than I can carry, a YashicaMat 2 1/4 twin lens reflex, a 35mm Olympus single lens reflex, a Cannon TX, also 35mm, and a Minolta Dimage Hi7 digital.
The Dimage digital and the F1 cost about the same, around $1600.00.
I can promise you that, unless you took the photo, you cant tell the difference.
I will explain the red problem with both Jenny’s and Kathi’s photos tomorrow.
Ed