Actually a couple of questions but you can work them up if need be.
Awhile back a comment was made about how marketing surveys were designed more from a desire angle when it came to selection of locomotives to be made vs the actual ability to pay for such “object of desire”. This led to a situation were one found mfg overstock and product dumpings etc. Sound familiar here?
One aspect I’m looking at here is detail accuracy. In my case, my selections ended up being boosted by the discovery of several ATLAS RS’s that showed up at a couple of Goodwills. Over the last while I amassed what basically came from someone else’s collection. Having said this, my budget, if this forgoing did not occur, would have been along the line of Bachman steam/deisel and Atlas products and fixing them up to what I see would have been a reasonable level of detail. To me, then, affordability is a key component in the scenario.
There was, not too long ago, someone in our local area who went after an object of desire, in this case, a series of MTH UP9000’s and some Challengers. He hit the credit card big time. Now, he is largly broke, and has issues with his financing----but he has his objects of desire. What does he do? Kvetch about, you guessed it, the cost of the hobby.[:-^]
Now, what I’m looking for is what that affordability means in terms of what you as a potential buyer of a steam/deisel locomotive can buy and how that differentiates from what you would desire. Just how broad of a gap is that for you as a buyer?
And the next question is just what you do to achieve that goal. Buy a step lower down and then build it up to your specs or just sit and save it up, then buy the piece?
Kvetching is an option but-------