My world just got flipped upside down and backwards. I got inspired to do a “what if” layout based on Athearns not-so-soon to come out (November) AC4400 in Milwakuee Road paint. That was HO, and would require the entire 10 x 11 foot room, double decks, a helix to connect the decks, and removable bridge tracks to make it conituous. I planned a roster made of newer locos. AC44’s, GP50’s, GP and SD60M’s, and just to make it tie together a few MILW FP45’s and SD40’s. Well that all go turned around.
I decided to do a search in N scale. Good thing I did. I found what I wanted and will now go with N scale. I can now fit basically my entire planned HO double track layout in a single deck around the room. No more double deck, no more helix, just a single removable bridge track to make it continuous. It won’t be fancy, maybe a T-beam made from 2x6’s I have laying around, some foam board so I can do some scenery, and probably a back drop to help block the door. But back to the point, I can do my hole entire modern day MILW in N scale, and all between 3 manufactorers. To tie it into what really did happen I will have some GP40-2’s, FP45’s, and SD40-2’s on hand, and maybe even a GP30. Here goes the list.
Bachmann: GP50
Atlas: early and late style cab SD60M’s, GP40-2, GP30
Athearn: SD75M, SD70M, FP45
Kato: SD90, SD90MAC, SD80MAC, SD70MAC, AC4400, and SD40-2
So now I have the wonder of figuring out which engines I want. All will be DCC, but I don’t know about sound. The Athearn FP45’s will come with DCC/sound but they’re also almost as much as an HO one. I may just use the engines I want in pairs, have one straight DCC and the other with sound. Then I could get the sound and only half my engines would need it so it would be cheaper.
This also lets me take more advantage of the layout. With HO I wasn’t going to