Now, an innocent question
does rule G exist?
I mean under that moniker, in anything published or quotable. This is an age of “section 01.005, subsection 01.005.32, paragraph 01.005.32.b” etc. Is the very term “Rule G” an anachronism or a catchall name for everything that deals with substance abuse on the rails. Could it be found as such in an employee timetable or rulebook, AAR guideline or…what? Lawyers have been active (like ferrets in heat) around these issues for eons and it’s hard to believe they could present a document with such a simple title as evidence.
In short, can anyone here quote verbatim Rule G from a current or past document?
Or cite one of it’s present mutations, with Title please!!!
How’s that everybody? Did I do good?
Ahem…now for the Dogster. My dad grew up in Detroit (not Deetroit, you hicks) and through the magic of DNA made me a lifelong Tigers fan. A lifetime of mostly frustrating summers was my inheritance. The brightest moment was when my heroes, down 3 games to 1 in the '68 series, turned the Card’s and baseball’s kitchen upside down. 30-game winner McLain was mostly absent, big-in-the-butt Lolich threw baffling curves while the Card’s Gibson threw blinding fastballs, an d then Freehan threw out Lou Brock. Series turned on a dime and the Tiges won. Then came '84, the practically Immaculate Season. First place all the way through, 35-5 at one point, and breezing to the world title.
Whenever I could see a fat pitch coming into Willie Horton’s wheelhouse in a certain way and situation, and his muscles twitch before swinging, I’d jump up and yell HOME RUN. I was only wrong twice in about ten chances and felt like I was right behind his bulging anticipative eyeballs…
Anyway we let your Cubs beat us 4-0 in 1907 and 4-1 in '08, but were improving. Then, Cobb-less we got you guys 4-2 in '35 and 4-3 in '45. I’ve resisted gloating over the Cub fan’s disappointments in those and HOW many other years? Why? Be