In the December 2009 Trains magazine Don Phillips akss where is Boardman why doesn’t he lead. Amtrak is going through some of its toughest times and the lack of leadership is all to evident. Boardman should take control or step aside and let someone run Amtrak that really cares whether we have a passenger train network or not. I believe that many jobs could be created in building new Amtrak equipment and that now is the time for responsible leadership to see that this and other projects at Amtrak are carried out with responsibility and leadership.
After listening to Boardman when he was on the west coast I came away with high hopes, but like Don Phillips this has turned to disappointment. Where is the leadership that was promised and when do the proposed car building etc. at least get started.
I for one believe Amtrak needs to be run by the private sector as management and project overseers with the ability to fire any Amtrak employees not doing the jobs they were hired to do or that have become so complacent they are worthless to Amtrak. There are thousands of unemployed Americans that would be anxious to take jobs that pay as well as Amtrak. But all new employees should undergo two months of training by Via Rail Canada before they can become Amtrak onboard personel and keep them away from present Amtrak employees as we do not want to infect the new hires.
Mr. Boardman it is time to step up to the plate or take early retirement you are certainly not doing Amtrak any favors with your present inaction.
I, too, am concerned with Joe Boardman’s lack of visibiltiy after a flurry of a start. Having known Joe from his early days in Upstate New York before moving to Albany and then Washington, I thought I had reason for high hopes. As I suggested to Don Phillips it might be the Washington political climate and culture being so different from state politics or that he is an appointed Republican working for a Democratic administration. He was appointed “intrim” with a set 12 month term which ends in November. He could be lying low working the political angles to his advantage; he could be listening to all the clamour for high speed rail, more passenger trains, etc.before jumping on a program; he might be waiting for the November elections and see what the voters have to say about the current administration and politicans; he might have to be quiet until after the November selection.is announced. I still am in his corner as I have seen his work before and still say he is the right man to be at the helm of Amtrak particularly at this time. I just hope those in Washington see it and those who can influence Washington do so.
Mr. Phillips is entitled, like so many others, to apply for a job with Amtrak and possibly be a CEO someday and then we can all sit back, be critical and complain about the kind of job he does. Otherwise, I suppose he is entitled to his opinions, but like most opinions, they don’t count for much when one is standing outside the department store.
On another note, it does look as if Amtrak will be asking Congress for supplemental funds in order to purchase new rolling stock in the future. Mr. Boardman did address this pressing issue in his weekly employee advisory, among other things.
Perhaps there are two reasons that might explain Mr. Boardman’s (as Mr. Phillips sees it) inaction.
First, as a former federal official, he is prohibited by law from lobbying his former agency, the FRA. I believe but am not certain that this prohibition will expire before the end of this year.
Second, there are a number of vacancies on the Amtrak Board of Directors. When the Administration finally gets around to filling them, it is a near certainty the individuals nominated will be labor union friendly if not former union officials. The next permanent Amtrak CEO, be it Mr. Boardman or someone else, is going to be faced with a tricky labor relations situation.
I spent nearly 40 years working for large corporations. Thousands of outsiders, including journalists, thought that they knew more about the company than those on the inside. They didn’t! I doubt that Mr. Phillips or any outsider really understands the dynamics of running Amtrak.
Mr. Boardman should be given the benefit of the doubt. Implementing change at a large organization, especially one that is as political as Amtrak, takes time. To expect significant change inside of a year is unrealistic.
Several things overlooked about Phillips and Boardman in this thread.
First, Phillips. He is an old line journalist, By that I mean he knows his craft as a writer and as a seeker and presenter of truth and information…and opinion, too, yes. But to be as successful as he has been he has had to research and monitor transportation, railroading, people, and politics. This is so much unlike our Wikopedia Media Wizards of today!
Second, Boardman. Some are overlooking the fact that he was appointed to a one year, temporary term which ends in November. And he, also as having been a former FRA chief, is not allowed to speak to many issues which he previously had a hand in. It is apparent to many, including Phillips (and myself) that Joe Boardman is the perfect person to be President of Amtrak. His being mum about so many things of late have raised alarms in us Boardman supporters that we fear he may not be selected to continue in the post. Thus our aloud wonderings and speculations about what is going on in D.C. concerning Boardman’s present tenure as well as the prospect for his continueing as Amtrak President. It is now November. Our questons should be answered by Thanksgiving.
Although I personally suspect you’re right about about the Obama administration, its union connections, and the eventual Amtrak Board nominees, we can only hope you are wrong. Otherwise, Amtrak is going to be even worse off than it has been. You can’t run any civilian organization where the employees’ interests are the priority without it turning into a fiasco. When government does it, the eventual results resemble CA’s problems.
Phillips has been around long enough to know what good passenger rail “output” looks like. Up to now, he’s been willing to believe that what ailed Amtrak was the input (i.e. funding), but now, with the prospect of the input being fixed, it appears the machinery that turns input into output may be the problem. And, that starts at the top. Amtrak has been crying “poor mouth” so long and so loud that they don’t have a plan, or it appears, any interest in developing a plan for dealing with increased funding. Amtrak is fundamentally a railroad. Many of us know what makes a railroad run well from the inside. There are clues all around that lead one to believe that Amtrak is a disfunctional, or just marginally functional railroad with a broken corporate culture. Phillips is just starting to believe this, too, it appears.
Don Phillips is held in high regard by railroad “insiders” , including top executives, as one who consistantly got the story right. If you ever had a chance to read his articles as a transportation reporter for the Washington Post, you would realize that he had an excellent knowledge and understanding of how railroads work. As a reporter, he is certainly as good as anybody reporting in trade publications aimed at the railraod business, and may have been the best at that writing for a general circulation newspaper. He was certainly way beyond the reporter who doesn’t know the difference between the conductor and the engineer. Further, he wrote so that the story could be understood by readers who were not insiders or as knowedgable of the industry as railfans.
One can certainly disagree with his opinions. Many do. But with respect to this month’s column, I think he is expressing a view that is shared by many in and around the industry and that is surprise that Boardman has not had his people come up with a fairly well developed list of “needs and wants”. Dave Gunn did that, even in the face of an administration that was making every effort to simply get rid of all the federal support for Amtrak. As much as anything else, Gunn got fired for being aggressive for pushing his agenda, but given the appearant attitude of the current administration, I just find it hard to believe that Boardman would face the same fate. It seems to me that if Boardman got an indication from the administration that he was asking for too much, as an experienced politician, he probably would be willing to trim the list and not pound the desk to get his way.
As far as the legal obstical keeping Boardman to going direct to the FRA, I can’t see that that would stop him from preparing plans to present to the Amtrak board. If it does, it certainly is an unfortunate rule for this case.
As the chief audit executive for a major corporation, I sat in on numerous executive committee and board meetings. Unless management wanted someout outside of these councils to know what transpired in them, no one, including industry knowledgeable reporters, was given a clue. As you point out, Boardman has not granted Phillips an interview. So why should I conclude that Phillips has any inside knowledge to buttress his opinions? Why should I believe that he is in a position to assess Mr. Boardman’s leadership skills?
Amtrak is a government-owned corporation. As such, the right of the public to “know” through transparency and the press is rather different than your experience in the US corporate world. I would suggest Phillips long experience as a writer on transportation gives him a significant knowledge base and many “inside” sources.
None needed and Phillips stated so in his column. The judgement of lack of leadership is based primarily on what Boardman has said publicly measured against what Amtrak hasn’t done in the past year. Pretty fair yardstick, I think.
For high-speed rail nationwide I don’t think we need to worry too much about Boardman and Amtrak.
The advocates for high-speed rail met last month in Washington and they all agreed that it is best served as a system independent of Amtrak (and the other railroads for that matter) and by private companies with public subsidy.
That’s pie-in-the-sky, but I have hopes.
Let Amtrak stumble along Very High Speed Rail really gets going.
OK, I give. What hasn’t Amtrak done in the past year? They haven’t killed off any trains, and in some instances, improved their service options, i.e., a long overdue restoration of checked baggage service at austin, TX, they have, I believe either ordered new baggage cars and/or are rebuilding some in Beech Grove, they are restoring P40’s to service and some badly needed Superliners. They settled, for now their Union contracts for the first time in 11 years, and according to Mr. Boardman, are finalizing a capital request aimed specifically at acquisition of new equipment. They have conducted route studies for reestablishment of various routes, are still working on Las Vegas service and seem to be on the verge of retaking LA’s troubled Metrolink operation. Oh yes, I believe the on time performance for the system is up as well, but someone can correct me on that one.
Amtrak always leaves something to be desired, but so does every railroad in the country. Amtrak is moving forward, albeit without Hollywood spotlights and neon signs to signal the activity.
I guess my point is that Mr. Boardman needn’t report to anyone except Congress and the DOT, and to a certain degree, his workforce, and in so doing, he can let Amtrak’s work be his report and resume.
I’ll give you two. One, he said there were too many employees just “going through the motions” and that those people needed to find new work. Anybody let go yet? Any management shake up? Nope. Second one. Boardman talks about Amtraks’s future and place in the world. $8B to be handed out for improved service. Way more than that applied for. Has Amtrak taken a position on any of it? Any route studies internally initiated? Nope. Nada. Zilch. It’s been almost a year. This ain’t rocket science. Fail!
Well put. However, Amtrak has not always been so inert. A good example would be the purchase of the French Turbos in the 1970s in an attempt to jump start some higher speed service. Didn’t exactly pan out, but it did give a push for higher speed service on the Hudson Line, which did pan out. Right now, Amtrak should be openly talking about how the proposals that are on the table right now would fit into their system, what the service would look like, what equipment would fit best, which they’d like to participate in and how that would work. Boardman still has complete hire/fire authority over his management team. If he were even the least bit serious about motivating the dead wood, he’d have done SOMETHING by now. Now, all the employees know he was just blowing smoke.
Well put. However, Amtrak has not always been so inert. A good example would be the purchase of the French Turbos in the 1970s in an attempt to jump start some higher speed service. Didn’t exactly pan out, but it did give a push for higher speed service on the Hudson Line, which did pan out. Right now, Amtrak should be openly talking about how the proposals that are on the table right now would fit into their system, what the service would look like, what equipment would fit best, which they’d like to participate in and how that would work. Boardman still has complete hire/fire authority over his management team. If he were even the least bit serious about motivating the dead wood, he’d have done SOMETHING by now. Now, all the employees know he was just blowing smoke.