I was reading about the “play value” thread recently here, and also thinking about a bunch of other things like Thanksgiving, the recent passing of my own dad and my own experiences with promoting this hobby. I was reading Don Baker’s last comment on that thread: I think the most important thing is a simple track, functioning (moving) train, and a KID. Won’t take much more than that!!
And while I understood where Don was coming from, that simple thought also opened up a whole floodgate of thinking and personal memories. I realized many suggestions on that thread were valid but yet lacking one thing…
The most important thing to add play value to a train layout for a child is US! Be it a dad, grandfather, uncle or just a guy taking interest in a kid who might not have a dad around. Joshua Lionel Cohen knew this too, which is why the bulk of Lionel advertising of years past was aimed at fathers AND their sons. I think that marketing ploy of Cohen’s was one of the major contributing factors to Lionel being so successful in years past. It’s US first and the trains second and not the other way around.
Now many say today that video games have taken the place of trains. To some degree, there’s truth to that. But there’s also some truth that I believe a good many fathers are NOT involved that heavily in their son’s lives. In our selfish “me, me, me” and “I gotta have it my way, right now” culture we tend to want to throw things at kids to keep them occupied to themselves… electronic babysitters.
The boy I mentioned in the other thread wasn’t really my nephew, though I call him that. He was a kid with no dad and in a single mother household that I took under my wing. I always wanted to be a dad, but never got the chance, so this was the next best thing. And besides, there are already so many kids who need to have a guy like me around.</