If the OLd Dog did this correctly, the following link should lead to TM5-628
http://www.usace.army.mil/publications/armytm/tm5-628/
The links gives the US Army standards for track work which should be somewhat similiar to the standards for civilian railroads.
Below is a link to TM5-850-2, another railroad related manual
http://www.usace.army.mil/publications/armytm/tm5-850-2/
Have fun
Good stuff.
Allowing for oxymorons (e.g. “military intelligence”) we will be able to begin track work in 2012.
What is wrong with the existing AAR standards?
Very interesting link…thanks!
underworld[:D][:D][:D][:D][:D]
Michael Stevens asked “what is wrong with AAR standards?” Answer, nothing really, but there was a time when the military wrote standards for everything. This was, admittedly, a duplication of effort, However, the military maintains retains historical copies of all of its’ documents wheras not all of your other standardization organizations do so. Consequently, if you come acrooss a thirty year old drawing that quotes an ASTM alloy, you may not be able to determine the actual composition of that metal.
Admittedley (a duplcation of a effort etc,) – admitted by whom?
This is valuable info – THANKS!!!
Thanks! I enjoyed this…and learned somethings. For one, they really are called turnouts.