‘Gen-Set’ switcher matches more powerful locomotive’s performance

Are you refering to Plato’s “Allegory of the Cave”?

I think the test is exactly what is going to be required of the new locomotive, several times per day, 360 days per year. It will feed strings of cars into the unloading track, and then haul a train similar to the test, to either UP or BNSF’s yard. I do question the choice of 4 axles, less for pulling and more for stopping. When setting cuts of cars to the crane tracks, I wouldn’t expect the air brakes on the cars to be cut in, so the locomotive will have to stop them with its own brakes. Six axles give you more brake pads and more locomotive weight to help you stop the cut of cars. I also wonder how the air compressor is set up, electric drawing power off of a bus, or link through clutches to one of the motors? Again pumping air through that much train will take some doing.

According to the info I’ve read, the control system is designed to equalise the usage hours on each engine (so each one has to be capable of running all the common auxillaries), so I suspect running everything off a common electrical bus is ihe only sensible option.

(But as an electronics design engineer I’m probably biased to that way of doing things [:)] )

It would be interesting to know how the load sharing is done between the three engines - the class 220/221/222 ‘Voyager’ DEMU’s in the UK have one engine/alternator set per car, all suppling power to a common train bus (apparently), with inverters running from it to drive the traction motors on each truck - that way loosing an engine doesn’t loose the powered axles on that car as well.

Tony

Yep, that’s Plato, not Socrates, although most of the great Western philosophers of our time (including me [;)]) find the two to be indistinguishable.