Honda? I thought he was bringing a Mercury into this bash-er ah,post.
CSmith stated -
I have had problems with my Genesis F7s and FP45s (right out of the box). The grills on the F7s wouldn’t stay on, and one runs jerky. The FP45s REALLY irritated me (Santa Fe warbonnet). At first I was really excited to get them, but they had details falling off out of the box (both of them), handrails that were falling off, and incorrect detailing (notched pilots). Whats worse is that the grabs that are supposed to be silver were left un-painted and look terrible. I don’t recall the prototype being delivered with unpainted stainless steel grabs.
I do believe that in the future that I will try to avoid purchasing Genesis locomotives at all costs. Hopefully Proto will do Warbonnet F7s with sound so I can finally get some decent Fs.
Smitty,
Thanks for the heads-up on the Genesis FP45. I purchased one (#107) but have not even taken it out of the box yet as I’m actually building an “along the wall” layout. I’m looking at it inside the box and see what you mean about the unpainted handrails on the cab and engine compartment doors. They, imho, don’t look bad since they are quite thin. Here’s the link to Arjay’s thread with very good photos that you posted.
http://cs.trains.com/forums/1/1436452/ShowPost.aspx#1436452
I will be extra careful when I finally do take it out of the box. I’ll be prepared to apply tiny dabs of glue on handrails that seem loose.
Thanks[4:-)][tup]
You guys must have the worst luck when it comes to buying locomotives. I have a good amount of Genesis, RTR and Blue box locomotives (65 Athearns in all) and have only had 3 that needed to be worked on before I put them on my layout. I bought two of the SP MP15AC’s when they came out and one just needed the grill pushed back in place and now they run and look flawlessly. The second locomotive was a RTR SP SD60 with a missing sun shade. Guess what I did, sent an email to Athearn and had a replacement set in 3 days. The third was a RTR BN SD40 with a broken hand rail, took me two minutes to fix with a little Plastruct. All these problems are not necessarily Athearns fault either. They could have been broken while being shipped from China or by some careless customer at the store shifting boxes around to find something he wants. I will admit that the hand rails are fragile, but there not so fragile that the slightest breeze will snap them in half like you guys make them out to be. Athearn makes their hand rails as small as they do because they look closer to the prototype, that’s why it says “As Close To Real As It Gets”. It also says “Recommended Age Group 8 Years And Older” [:-^] .
I have an FP45 and the thing that really amazes me is the fact that ALL of the hand rails are still on! I know it’s hard to believe but it’s true. Here’s the really odd part, even after running the thing for hour after hour it still quieter than any Atlas or Kato than I have. I must have gotten some kind of supper special locomotive that was made for Irv himself! But wait, it gets even odder than that. The Two MP15AC’s that I have are the same way! Even after banging around cars for hours with a 16 year old at the controls. They outperform Atlas and Kato’s and look good doing it.
As for the “QC problem with the new FP45” I did check it out. Athearn did not have problems with their quality control. The
If Athearn did put Genesis motors in the RTR, it would be well received. Locos being shipped with bent anticlimbers in the F45 is a QC problem as many were sold with the same issue. Also, a recall on a particular version of the F45 locos (SF pinstripe)doesn’t qualify as a QC issue either in your book? The rear anticlimber is attached with 2 plastic inserts/dowels into the rear of the loco and they are weak and tend to break if you try and tweak it level. I ended up glueing mine from the underneath with no problems and reglueing 1 grille. A small amount have been received with the loco loose where it is screwed down to the board and caused damage. I like to keep my locos in the boxes and I have to screw/unscrew the tank to run the loco and when I am done to secure it. I plan on drilling the 2 mounting screws through the tank bottom, but I am reluctant so far.
As previously stated, be careful with buying the RTR locos with the light bulb in the cab. The new run of GP38-2’s comes to mind. I was shocked to see the bond fire bulb in the cab and it isn’t DCC ready as the chassis is more to a BB loco than a RTR loco. On a side note, the Atlas GP38 is quite a looker and the sound is awesome.
On both of the units I purchased, grabs had fallen off the fuel tanks, and fortunately I noticed it and found them in the packaging. As far as the end ha
I don’t know where you buy your locomotives from but they must be buying the rejects from Athearn. After reading your post I decided to do a little experiment with the anticlimbers just to see how weak they really are. As it turns out you can pick up the whole locomotive by the anticlimbers and guess what, they don’t break. As for Athearns quality control, I never said that they got all of the ones with the bent anticlimbers. Some ATSF pinstripe’s got out but not on the huge level that some people think. (Athearn did get almost all of the GN F45’s though and now I have to wait five more months to get them) There is also some responsibility with the buyer also. Just open the box and give it a quick look over. Something like a bent anticlimber should be very easy to see. Hell at the shop I go to they even let you run the locomotive before you buy it.
First it was stated that Athearn QC caught them and didn’t let them ship to the stores and then when the recall is brought up it is now that they didn’t catch all…the tune changes. Whatever…Can we get back to the topic?
I guess I have to say it again. I never said that they got them all. They didn’t, and because they didn’t people like you use this as an excuse to make your favorite company look better. They got most of the F45’s and the rest that they didn’t get were sent back to Athearn for a replacement or a refund. The reality is that every company can have a problem at some stage of production and Athearn had one right at the end.
By the way, we are on the topic…
You’re a funny guy with your little jabs…a bit inconsistent, but nevertheless still funny. It seems that you are pro whoever and stick your head in the sand when valid points are brought out. Try and re-read where you said that Athearn didn’t have QC problems and they got them before they were shipped…not most of them as you now claim and after I brought up the recall.
On my layout now are: 2 Katos(SD70MAC and C44-9W),2 RTR(SD40-2’s), 1 Genesis(FP45),1 BLI Paragon(SD40-2),1 Atlas(Dash 8-40CW). I actually have more Athearn on there this time than anyone else until I shuffle out the motive power. I run every manufacturer that applies to my operations. I don’t prefer Athearn over Atlas over T55 over BLI over anyone else, but when you base fact on fact, the Genesis has quite a few problems. Genesis makes models that I have to buy to fill roster spots, but I know what to expect.
Not only with the F45, but say even the MP15AC has it’s issues even so that many advise against even buying their sound units, but rather get their non-sound units and installing your own sound. Every model that I comment about I have purchased and gave it the benefit of the doubt. It isn’t just me, but search this and other forums and read for yourself. I would like to see Athearn move away from the MRC decoders as that is alot of their problems. They did try and address the packaging issues and damage resulting from them. I even gave MRC its due with the sound on the SD45-2, which is actually one of my most favorite locos of alltime especially in the SF yellow bonnet paint.
The topic was Genesis vs. RTR. Atlas was brought in as the guy who started the topic asked about Atlas specifically. If he asked about BLI,T55,P2K,Kato or anyone else, I would have said what my experiences have given me.
lee, you and I both know that F45’s with bent anticlimbers got out. I knew that some got out before I made my first post and obviously you did to, hell you even bought one with a bent anticlimber. What I was trying to point out is that it was a very small amount. It would be almost imposable to not let one out and still be able to meet the delivery date.
Before you buy another Athearn that you won’t be happy with, that is, if you’re ever going to buy one ever again after this whole discussion I suggest opening the box and really looking the locomotive over. If the shop you go to lets you test run the locomotive take advantage of it. That way when you get the locomotive home you won’t have anyone to blame (including Athearn) but yourself if you don’t think that the locomotive meets your “standards”.[swg]
All I know is what you said initially isn’t what you now say and before you assume something else, I got the FP45 from another modeler who sold it to me with the rear anticlimber and 1 grille already broken off and I couldn’t pass as it was at a great price. You again assume that only a few got out, but as you should know some were pulled from shelves and there are more than a few who had to fix it. Well atleast you now admit some problems other than missing sunshades…lol. No worries. Again, I will repeat myself and say that Genesis is better than RTR, but when you buy Genesis be careful with the sound equipped ones and detailing, and as RF pointed out to take advantage of the lhs that allows test runs.
lee, if more than a few got out why haven’t there been more topics about bent anticlimbers? A search in the General Discussion of the Model Railroader forum for “F45 bent anticlimbers” only brings up this thread, and with 51,898 members on this forum, surely you, me and Smitty are not the only ones that bought the FP45’s or F45’s.
I guess that Athearn issues a recall on only a handful of defective locos right? You yourself acknowledge a recall, so that in itself should be indication to how many got out. [;)] …lol.
Lee, I didn’t buy and FP45’s/F45’s. Too many axles for me. I prefer 4 axle power and have all Athearn RTR’s (5) with DCC quick plug and they all run fine. Just working on them to add additional details.
Charlie
lee, sense you were the only one out of 51,898 people on this forum to report having a F45/FP45 with bent anticlimbers, yes, I’m pretty certain that it was only a handful of locomotives that needed to be recalled or sent back.
My opinion, which I have shared before, is Kato, Atlas et al before Athearn in either format if running qualities are your paramount concern.
But a usual comment; Athearn make an amazing array of paint schemes which the others don’t - so if you want a Boston and Maine so and so then you are lumbered with them: Oh by the way their rolling stock is fantastic value.
rf, Can you please READ the posts before you reply…and then read it again and get a good understanding before you post…Please. I received the loco in that condition and if you looked on another large online forum and search you will see what I am talking about. You do the work in finding it and if you can’t then PM me and I will give you the link. That makes perfect sense…Athearn issueing a recall for a handful of engines…especially when they did not do that on other engines. I really thought that you were being funny, but now I am starting to think otherwise from your comments that makes no sense.
You also keep bringing up the total number of members on this forum as a reference. Your thinking…or lack of it there is also flawed as you need to find out who has purchased the model out of the members and those who have had any issues…not mentioning unpainted grabs, detailing that arrived fallen off the model of which I did not notice nor experienced.
Again, I never said I don’t like Athearn nor would ever buy Athearn again. If another manufacturer makes a similiar loco in better quality I will choose that other loco as compared to RTR and reasons are again previously stated. I will say again that they make locos I need to fill some roster spots, so that again does not make sense to “never buy Athearn again”. What I did say was they have some QC issues(jury still out on how being part of Horizon will influence that) and due to their choice of decoder manufacturer, some running issues. I am done wasting time on proving a point that you already acknowledged and now trying to play off. I feel that I am beating a dead horse here and have come to realize that with some people, ignorance is bliss.
Also, I do agree that Kato drives are superb and I would love to see them expand their modern era, but while they already do SD70MACs,SD90s,AC4400CWs and C44-9Ws I think their plate is full. I do like their newer locos coming DCC/Sound friendly with the opening
lee, a used locomotive is a used locomotive. Remember that there is a reason that he is selling it to you at a good price and it’s not because he’s giving you the “friend’s discount”. Who says that there has to be a huge number of locomotives out to issue a recall? Even one getting out would make Athearns reputation look bad in the some people’s eyes. A perfect example is you.
You and I both know that if a large number of people had bought the F45/FP45 with the bent anticlimbers there would have been at least ONE post that brought it up on this forum other than this one. I searched the HO discussion of the Atlas forum and got zero results. I guess you’re going to have to post that link…
Well since this is a Genesis related thread…
(mentioned this before on another thread). I also have a Genesis SD45-2 in SCL’s scheme that I received as a birthday present in 07. Sweet, smooth runner of a locomotive. Big bonus is the Lok Sound system with accurate sound installed by my friend CMarchand. The horn is a custom edited Leslie RS5T-RR0. Always an attention getter whenever I run it at the club I visit.
Here she is hauling a fast freight. Sorry for the blurry image. I should have adjusted the camera for moving objects.
You said that you searched Atlas forum, so lets go back to the Atlas forum…this time search: Defective F45’s ATSF Only which is the actual title of the thread. You will also see a very well established hobby shop that pulled them from their shelves…hardly a few locos as you now claim.
Do you really think that Athearn will issue a recall on a handful of engines? Before I thought that you were just trying to drive in a point, but if you really believe that, then I am starting to really understand some of your replies. Seriously, Athearn will not issue a reacll on a few locos. Read this:
http://www.tonystrains.com/tonystips/2007/112907.htm
That was when Tony’s received the 4-8-4 and had issues with them. Tony’s contacted the buyers who bought from them to see if they still wanted the locos. Thet even touched briefly on the 2-8-2(you know the ones that sit and sit at the train shows) which was released in later runs with the balance/derailing issues. Athearn was contacted, but they still produced them without addressing the issues in later runs.