Besides brass, do we know if any of the Climax logging engines made over the years are any good? I’m thinking particularly of the one that has the angled piston and rod, rather than that other, boxy little tank thing (no shade on the boxy little tank thing, just not what I’m asking about right now).
Anybody had one? Experiences? Opinions? Wild guesses?
Bachmann made some for a while, although they had some bad gear problems early on. I thought they fixed that with some later batches, but I’m not sure.
I’ve got 4 of the Bachmann climaxes. 2 2 truck and 2 3 truck climaxes. All of them needed split gears replacing but once they were fixed they run beautifully. One of the 3 truck ones has a sound decoder and anything over about 2 mph sounds like its going to explode but thats normal as it takes lots of steam to move. I’ve also tried the MDC one but its very noisy and doesn’t look very good so I heavily modified it.
Pretty cool, Kevin! The one thing that is missing is evidence of the diagonally mounted cylinders.
That could easily be compensated for by panels covering where they would be, as sometimes they would cover over the moving machinery on these, because it would scare horses. Kinda like MDC’s approach. Just a hint to add realism.
Thanks bmtm, I’ve seen plenty of these in my search for the other. They’re actually growing on me a little bit.
Thanks Dan. Yes, I searched and did not find Climaxes by Rivarossi.
I’ve heard this about Bachmann’s Shays, didn’t know it applied to their Climax as well. I’m curious… are those replacement gears still available (are those the ones from Northwest Rail Link something something?) and more importantly, how fiddly is the job of replacing them? Do you think a clumsy person could do it? With the help of this league of esteemed modelers, I was able to successfully rewire an Atlas loco I got at a swap meet whose reverse light went on when it went forward and whose headlight went on when it went backward, but it was almost more than I could handle – I muffed the heat-shrink tubing, barely managed to get good solder connections. If replacing gears in a geared loco is more complicated or “watchmaker-ish” than that, it wouldn’t be something I’d venture into.
Words to live by. Bravo.
Thanks all. I’ll hang back now but I’m still interested in anyone’s experiences with manufactured (plastic) diagonal-cylinder Climaxes, particularly the Bachmann.
Thanks for the word, Simon. This jibes with what I’ve mostly heard about the Bachmann Climaxes. I looked at the NWSL site and the replacement parts are cheap enough. If I see a Climax at the train show tomorrow and it’s a good price I may consider it, but yeah, I don’t really look forward to the necessary surgery I’d have to perform.
Replacing the climax gears is easier than replacing the Bachmann shay gears I’ve found. I think I just bought the short shafts in the bogies preassembled from bachmann rather than trying to fit the NWSL ones onto the shafts.
The issue with using a diesel chassis to build a Class A Climax is the wheelbase. All the drawings of small Climax locos I have found have wheel bases less than 4ft - 3.25ft appears to be common. Almost all commercial powered trucks have much larger wheel bases 5ft or more. The Roundhouse Climax conversion used their boxcab mechanism - with the large truck wheel base.
Not trying to be a nitpicker because I’ll probably end up in the same position. Just saying there is an appearance issue.
Now back to trying to make that MDC (Roundhouse) mechanism not sound like a coffee grinder.[:D]
I bashed together this little fella below a few years ago. I used two NWSL Stanton drives, plus various parts from my parts box, mostly MDC parts. The drives were disguised using trucks from the original MDC climax. The trucks are way too big… but a fun project. I should probably go back to it for improvements.
This sounds like a good idea. I guess you mean you bought replacement short shafts after the gear broke, right? Or are you saying you immediately bought a spare of what’s already in the product new?