HO Scale Detailed Weathered Allegheny Locomotive

Since we have learned to remake Timken lightweight rods, and since even the drawings for the forming dies for the rod eyes survive at NWHS, the next ‘science project’ after T1 5550 ought to be a set of the Timken rods as applied to the last 5 A locomotives – I think with an eye to competing with the C&O Chessie mega-streamliner if the postwar market in fast trains to Cincinnati had panned out.

The great discovery, I think partly accidental, was that the 2-6-6-4 worked nicely as a “Berkshire-and-a-half” with lower augment and divided drive of very low rigid wheelbase, to go very fast. Fast Berks themselves only went back about half a decade when the N&W As were on the drawing board…

I just read most of the C&O Historical Society book “Chesapeake & Ohio - Allegheny 2-6-6-6 Locomotive - A Retrospective” by Karen Parker and Thomas W Dixon Jr.

Earlier in this thread there was some discussion about how fast the Allegheny could go and did go.

This book offers some reasonably well documented information on the subject, including records from the original field tests and dynamometer car readings.

During the testing, with freight trains as heavy as 14,000 tons, loco 1608 reached speeds of at least 46 mph.

In another section of the book, a number of engineer stories, many backed up by dispatcher and tower logs, clearly indicated that even with 5,000 to 6,000 tons the Allegheny’s often reached speeds above 60 mph. And that the engineers all reported the engines to be smooth and steady at those speeds.

Several stories indicated that engineers often got messages from dispatchers and tower operators to “slow down”.

Many of these same engineers indicated the 2-10-4 T-1’s would not run above 60 mph, and that by 60 mph they would start to have noticeable agument pounding. It was also noted in the book that the T-1’s were also hard on the track, especially at a number of down grade sharp curves in particular - whereas the Allegheny’s were not.

Also, regarding troop trains during WWII, one engineer, Burks Ball, said that they regularly pulled troop, hospital, and prisoner trains of as many as 40 cars and a single Allegheny had no problem keeping the same schedule as the regular passenger trains… with many of those 40 cars being heavyweight sleepers.

For those not familiar, 40 heavyweight passengers cars is something in the neighborhood of 4,000 tons.

I think it is clear that the Allegheny was a fast and powerfull locomotive, (and possibly the best balance of highest power, good speed, and high tonage abilty) just like the N&W Class A, and that the C&O often used them more for the

The model… remember? C’est magnifique, oui? [bow] Kinda makes ya wanna hunt up about 150 or so loaded hoppers - doesnt it? Now who do we know has a layout big enough to handle such a calamity?

Respects,

PMR

Years ago in a round robin group I was in, we pulled 110 cars with the Rivarossi model on a basement sized layout that I designed and hleped build.

My BLI/PCM N&W Class A was similar in performance.

My new layout will handle 100 car hopper trains, they would require being doubled in and out of the yard which will hold 50 34’ cars on the longest tracks.

Planning to get some work done on the layout room today.

Sheldon