Had a discussion with a modeler on the web. Good guy, but sometimes I see why some modelers can be turned off by other well meaning hobbyists.
He spent a few lines trashing the 1990s-early 2000s manufactured Life Like Proto 2000 locomotives and doesn’t understand why I like them so much. Comments: “They’re below standard, body contours are wrong, E-unit noses are off, doors that open are goofy, split axles, cheap mechanism, nowhere close to a Genesis model, etc, etc,.”
OK, fair enough. My point to him is simply that some us that own LL P2K units are on budgets and very satasfied with our units (in spite of some issues like cracked axles, and flimsy handrails). Imho, with detailing, weathering, and minor mechanical tweaking, LL P2Ks can be attractive smooth runners. They do have to be hard-wired for DCC. I own a fleet of P2Ks but have no plans of getting rid of any of them.
The gentleman didn’t seem to comprehend that because I grew up in the Athearn Blue Box / Atlas Yellow Box era, the LL P2K units with their so-called “goofy” openable doors, yet fairly detailed bodies are very attractive to my eyes. Add to that LL produced units in roads I model, the ACL and SCL.


He jokingly thinks that I might as well start buying 70s era Bachmann units. With a mindset like that, I usually just sigh and change the subject. Why argue? He seems to have forgotten that a few decades ago, top-notch modelers were showcased in MRR magazine that beautifully spruced up and detailed Tyco GP20 shells, Roco Model Power E-units, Atlas Yellow Boxers, and Athearn BB “wide body” locomotives!
While wanting accuracy, I’m willing (and I think some others are too) to live with some minor dimensiona