One of my know-it-all coworkers said “they” have got the container problem “fixed”. “They’re just going to ship all the container through Florida. Problem solved”.
At a meeting with a supplier last week, we were told that the cost to ship a container of doors from Malaysia to central Minnesota was $4800 last year. Now, we are being told, that cost is passing $20,000 and heading toward $30,000 as demand and supply are so far out of whack. On top of that, they are saying that the usual lead time has stretched from 8 weeks to 17+ weeks from factory to loading dock.
Can container traffic be diverted that easily? Does Florida do a lot of container receving, and can they handle a lot more? Can the railroads handle an increase in container traffic from Florida to the Midwest and Upper Plains? Wouldn’t something like this add a lot of expense?
Related thought- do any container ships go to the Great Lakes?
Looking at the various pie charts, Florida handled far less freight than Long Beach/ LA. While maybe there is some available capacity in Florida, I doubt there is anything close to enough to make a significant dent in west coast traffic. If it was that easy, the problem would have been “solved” much earlier.
Also not shown is transload capacity - how much of that container traffic can move out by rail vs. truck. I imagine there are some ports that are better for outbound rail movements than others.
I think the biggest question is whether any of the current container ships can reach the Great Lakes via the St Lawrence. While the Soo locks can handle the 1,000 footers, the St Lawrence locks are a bit smaller. Each lock is 233.5 metres long (766 feet), 24.4 metres wide (80 feet) and 9.1 metres deep (30 feet) over the sill.
On the Welland Canal, max boat length is 740 feet, beam is 78 feet, and draft is 26.5 feet.
Panamax container ships are 965 feet long, with a 106 foot beam and a 39.5 foot draft.
There were some smaller container ships on the Great Lakes in the late 1960’s and early 1970’s. Manchester Liners was a major carrier in the market at that time.
My understanding is that virtually all container ports in North America are under volume stress. The Pacific ports more so than the Atlantic ports, but all the Atlantic ports all have their issues.
There are container ports in Florida. But there is no way they can replace the overwhelmed capacity of the much larger US west coast ports. The Florida ports could take a bit, as could New Orleans, Mobile, etc. But I don’t think it would be enough to make a difference.
East coast US ports are getting backed up too.
There is a small container operation on the Great Lakes out of Cleveland. But, as has been mentioned, it is very capacity limited due to the low vessel draft allowed on the Seaway canals. This Cleveland-Europe service also cannot operate in the winter.
There is no silver bullet for this supply chain mess. The mess is starting to drag down the economy. And it’s helping create significant inflation as shortages proliferate.
There is no ONE fix that fixes the ‘supply chain’ and restores ‘just in time inventory’. Organizations that view sustained operations as critical - will have to expand their warehousing inventory so that they are not as tied to the fluctuations of their own supply chain, with the understanding that THEIR supply chain can be adversely affected by problems in other people’s supply chains.
Backlogged ports, be they US or foreign affect virtually ALL supply chains.
It is amazing what happenings can create major transportation nightmares in supply chains.
In the middle 70’s the USSR had several years of harvest failures and began buying grain from the USA. Gulf and Atlantic ports soon became swamped with export grain for the USSR.
In the late 70’s and early 80’s the Export Coal market boomed. At one time there were reported to be over 100 vessels waiting to dock at the Chessie System’s Curtis Bay Coal Pier. There were similar backlogs at Newport News on the C&O as well as Lamberts Point on the NS. In response additional coal handling facilities were built in Baltimore and Hampton/Newport News area. In Baltimore the Bayside and Consol facilities were built, in the Hampton/Newport News are the Dominion Terminal facility was built.
Additional container facilities will be constructed and additional handling infrastructure will be built and in several years world shipping will become fluid agai
I am reading all of the news opinions as to what is causing the supply chain problems. The news makes it seem like this problem exploded on the scene a couple weeks ago. Yet it has been around since about March 2020. Maybe it mitigated a bit toward fall 2020, but it was clearly back by last April, particularly with computer products. We have been told that inflation is growing worse and causing prices to rise.
Now all of a sudden we are told that it is the supply chain shortages causing prices to rise. And we are also being told that our consumer demand is excessive and that is what is causing supply chain problems, and by extension, causing inflation.
Yet up until a couple days ago, the explanation for rising prices was too much deficit spending; a classic cause for inflation. That is the classic cause of inflating the money supply by borrowing so we have too many dollars chasing too few goods.
This link contains a quote that I do not understand:
Until recently, west coast ports were not working 24-hour days. Supposedly they have started. Perhaps that is what is meant as an example of “stepping up” to meet the crisis in logistics?
The ports of Oakland, Tacoma and Seattle can be used to take some of the strain off the LA ports. NO ONE has mentioned any overload of traffic going into these ports. It is always the LA ports. Why not shift some of the traffic north, unload the ships and move them back to their next destination instead of saying “woe is me we have shipps waiting to unload”.
Did this jam up begin with the Ever Given ? Can these super max ships even go to other west coast terminals ? Are they so oversized that they cannot go thru the Panama canal to go to east coast terminals ?
I wonder if it is that simple? Can a ship be diverted to a different port without major problems? Is there capacity there to unload, and railroad or truck capacity to forward the containers?
Do you really believe No One has thought of that? Those ports are backed up too.
And if you start trying to move a lot more cargo through them, where are they going to get the container chassis, truck drivers, and stevedores to handle it?
This has no ready solution. And the government types/fools can say what they want, but they can’t “Enact” a container chassis.
Edit to add: We buy groceries on-line from Walmart. We wanted two baking potatoes. Walmart was out of stock. When Walmart Grocery can’t get potatoes to sell, you know there’s a real problem with no easy answer.
I would opine that physical port capabilities might be a problem. Draft could be a limiting factor. I’m sure much of that information is available - some one else can dig it out.
As mentioned, throughput could be an issue. Do the roads and the railroads have the capacity to handle a significant increase in traffic? Are the RR cars and truck chassis available? Does the railroad have crews and equipment available to run more trains, or if not more trains, then longer trains?
Running those ships to another port shouldn’t be anything that can’t be sorted out. Right now they’re sitting around, waiting. A day or two in transit to another port wouldn’t be an issue, I wouldn’t think.
Norris: I think you may have hit on what might be the $64,000.00 Question…[#oops]
So far the Forum members are mentioning Container traffic rerouted to Florida…Also possibly, might be Ports on the Gulf (Alabama?), and possibly New Orleans? The problem seem to be getting the ships from Pacific Ports, in California; and some of the other Left Coast Ports?? The major issue there would seem to be Transiting the Panama Canal…[Cost + per Ship??| My guess is mucho ++ expensive ?
There is another Port on the West side; Lorenzo Cardenas,Mx. Currently served directly by the KCSdeM (KCRRR) and possibly, beforer long by the “NEW” (?) Canadian Pacific owner of the Kansas City Southern RR ? Such a route would cut off the Panama Canal (Water Route) Transit Costs??
Which brings me to ask: (Since the KCSRR owns the parallel cross istmus Panama Canal RR… Does Canadian Pacific get to own that also? Have seen that part of the KCS Railroad Deal, mentioned anywhere? [:-^] )
I’ll add to the comments on Great Lakes container trade. Not only are draft restrictions an issue. If you’d were to operate any year round service it would require ice class vessels which are more expensive to build.
I am reading all of the news opinions as to what is causing the supply chain problems. The news makes it seem like this problem exploded on the scene a couple weeks ago. Yet it has been around since about March 2020. Maybe it mitigated a bit toward fall 2020, but it was clearly back by last April, particularly with computer products. We have been told that inflation is growing worse and causing prices to rise.
Now all of a sudden we are told that it is the supply chain shortages causing prices to rise. And we are also being told that our consumer demand is excessive and that is what is causing supply chain problems, and by extension, causing inflation.
Yet up until a couple days ago, the explanation for rising prices was too much deficit spending; a classic cause for inflation. That is the classic cause of inflating the money supply by borrowing so we have too many dollars chasing too few goods.
This link contains a quote that I do not understand: