MR Express: What about the new products?

Any CPR or CNR/GTW would be really great.

About the Challenger’s being released, why? There already is the Rivarossi challengers, certainly there are other big articulateds out there that haven’t yet been modelled, such as a Yellowstone. With both Athearn and Lionel putting out the Challenger, neither is going to make the profits needed to continue manufacturing, and all will go kaput. Competition is good, but if it means all the manufacturers are going to make the same thing, then no one wins.

Also, with the exception of Bachmann, no-one seems to be making steam locomotives that can fit realisticly on small layouts, sure the BLI Hudson can go around 16" curves, but the passenger cars can’t, and on something up to 8x12, it’s really to big. Likewise with the articulateds and mallets, only those with huge layouts can actually use them, and they seem to end up buying a half dozen of them!

When was the last time someone produced a 4-4-0? Something as widespread as that will always be a great seller, with 10,000’s of them built and used from the early days right up to the end of steam.

Broadway Limited also seems to be really trying to go bankrupt, with about 1 new loco a month for the next year, and with all of them large locomotives, do they really thinik they will be able to stay afloat?

Lionel’s return to HO should’ve been with a locomotive that isn’t available on the new market, such as light engines, but with a Challenger already produced by Rivarossi and Athearn coming out with one, one has to ask why? That is not the way to get back into a market.

And another thing that bothers me is the lack of Canadian road names on production models and their mention in reviews. Both the CPR and CNR used many standard US designs, and CPR’s Fowler box car was the most widely seen with something over 75,000 produced. With the exception of Life-Like Canada, to get Canadian roadnames on the models you seem to either get custom painted ones, or

Please check out the Lionel announcment forum for the reactions of people to the 700 price range.

I love big steam, but I can only use (and afford!) so much of it. What I’d like to see is a “generic” smaller 2-8-0 - a “Harriman” Consol such as that offered by MDC lo these many years, or even the Varney/Bowser “Old Lady.” Most railroads had some permutation of an early-1900’s-vintage 2-8-0 on the roster, and a model built to contemporary standards in detailing and operation would HAVE to sell - and keep selling. Optional parts and/or versions could make such a model well-nigh “universal” in its appeal.

And I’d like to see the same for a Ten-Wheeler - again, the hoary MDC and Varney/Bowser versions could be updated.

Oh, and yes - on both models, please offer optional valve gear and cylinders, so that Stephenson or outside motion could be applied to suit the modeler’s prototype and/or whim.

And why not a 4-4-2? And cast another vote for a 4-4-0.

Jim

Grove City, OH

How about some 48ft. refer containers and while we’re about it, some genpak containers to power them. It’s funny to see one manufacturer build 53ft well cars and another build 53ft containers, I’m glad the 53ft cars weren’t like their 48ft. cars that could only take 40ft containers. How about a 56ft. connected spine car that can carry containers from 20 to 53ft. in legnth or 2 28ft or 40-53ft. trailers. I see all these items crossing Iowa every day . Walt Kulpa Newton,Ia.

I’m hoping for a Padukah GP9/10 in HO. That should fill a quite sizeable gap in the loco market.

Jon Grant, UK

A standard Baldwin logging/shortline 2-8-2 has been needed for years. I’m sure Baldwin built hundreds of this catolog model. You could place a saddle tank on make it one of the “Minarette” style locomotives, or you can place a narrow gauge chassis under it and model the EBT! You can offer the locomotive as slide valve or piston valve and use different valve gears. I’m pretty sure they also built side tank versions on the same chassis.

RTR steam has been hitting an all time high in quality this year. Lets hope this continues with more offerings!

Smokebox

I think the new steamers are nice, but a little pricey even for what they have installed and include. Maybe they will come down in cost if enough people buy them. Yeah, I’m dreaming, lol.

What I’d really like to see is a 4-6-2 in the streamline sheetmetal used on the B&O’s “Cincinnatian.” But I have only seen or heard of, I think, 2 or 3. 1 was a brass version, although I can’t afford or find one, and the others are not really as accurate as they need to be in color and detail.

Also, a passenger car set to go with that of modified heavy weight cars. Maybe I missed something, but I have yet to see any of that in person and maybe come across even the lower version, let alone the brass.

Ehh, maybe I missed some somewhere, I’m always on the lookout even when I can’t buy.

I’m delighted with the new products, especially the the reasonably priced plastic shelled steam locomotives. Since I model the Southern and the L&N, I don’t have a need for Challengers or Big Boys, but most of what i really need is now available or soon will be. I’m really looking forward to Broadway Limited’s heavy mike. I run DCC with Sountraxx decoders so they will fit right in and save me some time and work.

What would I like to see? First choice would be a Southern Railway PS-4 heavy pacific. Second would be an L&N H-28 or 29 consolidation. Since all three are sufficiently different from anything else including the USRA heavy pacifics it probably isn’t going to happen but it doesn’t hurt to hope. I’d also like to see a USRA double sheathed 40’ boxcar done with with separate grabs and other details ala Intermountain or Branchline, and as a kit rather than RTR.