This is not going to be very welcome news for many of you, but BLI has the Q2 listed for delivery late this year! That was the 4-4-6-4 Duplex which was the most powerful non-articulated steamer ever produced. First they announce that they will make the UP 9000 series 4-12-2 engines, and now this!?
Barry,
How many switchers do you want? Proto 2000 already has made several runs of 0-8-0’s & 0-6-0’s. Spectrum has decent 0-6-0T’s, and Mantua has 0-6-0T’s and 0-6-0 Camelbacks. What’s the problem?
As long as we keep buying them, they will keep making them. Who can’t resist the look of a large steam loco? I suspect most of them will end up on a shelf unused.
Would I buy one? I doubt it. No room to run it (unless I put that 2 track “display loop” around the outside walls of my layout room).
Yet another example that, as I’ve pointed out before, the collector faction in model railroading and not the actual modelers, is what today is driving the manufacturers. If built to true scale and as a non-articulated just as the real Q2 was, the model will likely require track radii well in excess of 48" to operate (maybe 60"!). How many HO layouts have you every seen, or even heard of, with such specs? Don’t expect to see many small, quality steamers in the future, that’s clearly not where the market is going. The future is in making shelf queens. How’s about a Pennsy S-1 next?
Super-Heavy Weighted Brass Construction and Detail
Features the ALL-NEW Paragon2 SOUND & Control System
Integral DCC Decoder with Back EMF for Industry Best Slow Speed Operation in DC and DCC (1 smph @ 128 Speed Steps)
Precision Drive Mechanism with sprung drivers engineered for continuous heavy load towing
and ultra-smooth slow speed operation
Fly-Wheel Synchronized Puffing Smoke and Chuff
Grade & Load-sensing variable Smoke & Chuff Intensity (Less smoke and lighter chuff sounds
when on a decline/less load; more smoke and belabored chuff when on inclines/more load.)
5-Pole Can Motor with Skew Wound Armature
Premium Caliber Painting with Authentic Paint Schemes
From a modeler´s point of view, there is no sense in releasing locos like that, but they are sellers! With the vast number of roads in the US, it is some job to find out which loco will sell, as the “standard” USRA types are pretty much covered by the industry already. I don´t think, that the typical XY RR 2-8-0 workhorse will sell well in the market. Market potential for those UP or PRR monsters seems to be bigger…
That´s why Marklin re-releases the Big Boy again - it will also sell in Germany, because it epitomizes US steam!
… and we will run it on our standard 14" radius! [swg]
That’s because the masses have turned away from trains as a hobby, and manufacturers have decided to chase the money of collectors in order to survive. Since collectors usually want either oddball items or else big, impressive items (either of which set them apart from the “less-important” masses), it only stands to reason that manufacturers would build less-common engines for a relatively limited number of people as opposed to a more-common engine that would appeal to a broader cross-section of the hobby.
So tell me why would a collector want a factory (i.e. “mass”) produced model that smokes and makes the appropriate sounds and maybe a few questionable ones coupled with the compromises required to make it go around 22" radius curves only to have it sit in a display case? Seems to me that this anonymous evil collector would rather have the hyper-detailed models produced by the likes of PSC, Glacier Park, OMI, etc., which don’t make the compromises, which are built in very limited quantities and which go for 3+ times more, thus ensuring this “spawn of Satan collector” the satisfaction of knowing he has something the great unwashed masses can’t afford.
As for “common” engines, every single USRA engine has been done already, albeit in as delivered condition and not reflecting years of shoppings and resultant modifications by the railroads that had the originals, not to mention copies.
What’s your definiton of a common engine? For an SP/UP fan, those would be the Harriman 4-6-0, 2-8-0, 2-8-2, 4-6-2 (Light and Heavy). Bachmann chose to base their Harriman 2-8-0 on the IC engines with Baker valve gear rather than the more numerous SP and UP versions with valves slightly inboard of the cylinders actuated by Stephenson Valve gear. At least the Spectrums are versatile conversion fod
Yes, it probably will look very much like that 4-12-2 articulated abomination MTH recently put out. That was a classic example of turning a scale model into a toy train.
CNJ831
And why, pray tell, would this (the Q2) be a case of pandering to a collector of scale locomotives as you stated earlier?
You’re right, the MTH UP 9000 is an abomination. No collector in his right mind would want one of those, so how do collectors end up being targets of misplaced outrage?
There’s no doubt in my military mind, Mark. They’d sell one out of very four if they listed it for 26" or above, and even then it would have to be doubly articulated.
I am curious how BLI will treat the blast pipes on their version of the UP 9000’s.
loathar, I have to admit that the description and specs is mighty intriguing. I am just afraid how many burgers I’m going to have to flip to get one.