NTSB DETERMINES INADEQUATE RAIL INSPECTION CAUSED 2006 PENNSYLVANIA DERAILMENT

Washington, DC

The National Transportation Safety Board determined today that the probable cause of the derailment of a Norfolk Southern Railroad Company train was the railroad’s inadequate rail inspection and maintenance program that resulted in a rail fracture from an undetected internal defect. Contributing to the accident was the Federal Railroad Administration’s inadequate oversight of the internal rail inspection process and its insufficient
requirements for internal rail inspection.

On Friday, October 20, 2006, a Norfolk Southern freight train (68QB119), en route from the Chicago, Illinois area to Sewaren, New Jersey, derailed while crossing the Beaver River railroad bridge in New Brighton, Pennsylvania. The train consisted of a three-unit locomotive pulling three empty freight cars and 83 tank cars loaded with 660,952 gallons of denatured ethanol. Twenty-three of the tank cars derailed. Several of the cars fell into the Beaver River. Approximately 20 of the cars released ethanol, a flammable liquid that ignited and burned for 48 hours. A seven-block area of New Brighton was evacuated. There were no injuries or fatalities.

“Because Norfolk Southern did not have an adequate rail inspection and maintenance program, they put the public, crew, and environment at risk,” said NTSB Chairman Mark V. Rosenker.

http://www.ntsb.gov/Pressrel/2008/080513a.html

well maybe now people will stop ragging on csx so much becouse of poor track conditions and derailments… this might actuly show some of the csx “haters” that there NS isnt so perfict afterall…

csx engineer

You are right that people should stop ragging on CSX about track, NS isn’t the best, but Conrail was good, I still hate CSX/ NS

Its Conrailtastic!

Tjsingle

Conrail had its own set of issues that CSX and NS have been struggling with since the breakup. There is a set of operating officials and their beancounters praying the statute of limitations on records hits before the smoke & mirrors PR act is made public.

It’s one thing to do the testing. It is quite another to keep track of the records and keep track of remedial actions. Something tells me the disconnect over data integrity combined with a legal witch-hunt is woven all through this. “Hidden defect” is something of a misnomer.

ps - IF FRA decides to run a detector car program like it runs its geometry car programs, please don’t even bother to put out the money to start the program.

That sounds interesting. Would you care to elaborate?