So, if I build my mountains out of wire screen and plaster, or hydrocal hard shell, and you build yours by covering a stack of foam with plaster cloth, how do they look any different if both are done with good geological based features?
So why is wire screen and plaster “obsolete”? I’m still waiting for someone to explain the magical advantage of foam? I like the fact that my terrain is completely hollow underneath, making easy access to hidden trackage in tunnels, staging yards, scenic wiring at all elevations, etc.
I’ve been at this since 1968, and I do a lot of stuff differently than we did it then. And I still do a lot of stuff the same way we did back then.
I have never accepted the idea that something is better just because it is a new/different approach.
So digital or in print, I think most of the old info has value. I still run DC, and from what I can tell on facebook many of you might be surprised at how many others are still DC. A schematic for a DC throttle or the various options for block control that do not involve “flipping toggles” might hold more value than you think.
Now, I use a pretty advanced version of DC, with full voltage pulse width modulated wireless throttles (just like a DCC decoder), progressive walk around control with semi-automatic block selection, route turnout control, detection and signaling all integrated together. While I designed my control system myself, the building blocks of it are based on systems build by people like Bruce Chubb, Ed Ravenscoft, and Paul Mallery back in the 50’s, 60’s and 70’s. Those magazines from when I was a toddler or a teen came in pretty handy.
It might not hurt for a few newer people to take a minute and understand the old ways just a bit. Maybe then I would not have to explain that multiple powered units work fine on DC with only a few minor issues in some cases.
I’m all for it, they should digitize any and all titles they can. But I will still keep my print copies.
Sheldon