Print vs digital? Your preference?

Welcome! I agree with the access i couldnt get in either.

1 Like

Just plug the charger into the razor outlet. Camp out 'til your leg falls asleep…

1 Like

I guess you like to live dangerously! :scream:

1 Like

If you don’t have a GFCI in your bathroom, you’re hopelessly behind the times (and out of code compliance).

2 Likes

I do SO have a GFCI in the bathroom, had it for the last 38 years!
But I’m STILL not bringing the laptop in the bathroom! That’s what the print versions of “CT” and “CTT” are for! :star_struck:

1 Like

Surely not as the 21st-Century equivalent of the Sears catalogue!

2 Likes

I would take a guess at what magazines with the initials CT and CTT that belong in the bathroom are named, but I’d get banned immediately… :winking_face_with_tongue:

2 Likes

Candy Tails or Cousins That Thump? :goblin:

2 Likes

Groan.
Classic Trains and Classic Toy Trains. Jeez, you trying to get yourself banned?

1 Like

Of course not! That’s what the Washington Post is for! :rofl:

1 Like

If the Post is anything like the New York Times used to be, you’re risking a chronically atreous posterior!

I remember the year the Times went to offset printing, my mother gave my father those “Gloves for The Times” for Christmas, and great merriment was had by all. Not sure what would help in this other circumstance… perhaps a liberal application of Invisible Glove, but that only, ah, transfer-prints the difficulty…

2 Likes

:rofl: :rofl: :rofl:!!!

1 Like

There is NOTHING that compares to a real paper print magazine. I’m not knocking digital, for it does have its place. But if MR or Classic Trains or any of the other mags I subscribe to cut out their PRINTED issues, I will no longer be a subscriber.

3 Likes

Print for me b/c cheaper and I find it’s easier to comprehend when hard copy. I find I don’t retain as much reading on a screen.

1 Like