In my MR history of about 7 different layouts, I have never run or modeled a real railroad like C&O, N&W, etc. All have been so called “fantasy roads” which allowed a lot of freedom from nit-pick details and running assorted motive power.
It was only with the last two layouts and now my own current, new HOn3 layout project that I felt obliged to see 1. A need for the road in the areas I claim to work in. 2. Try and explain how the motive power came to be there. 3. Produce a history that tells the story of the road up to the point in time being modeled. In short, it is sort of like this road could have really existed if fate or history had branched another way.
I think some model rails do this and I seem to remember yarns being spun in old MR magazines around fantasy roads which relieved the modeler of at least some derision from mild nit-pickers. Of course, some few folks will not like any idea related to what they dub a “fantasy road”. I feel, however, that most modelers are somewhat forgiving about a fellow modeler’s railroad.
Some call these fantasy roads, but fantasy, to me, means you don’t even have to have real towns or follow any sort of local geography and can invent industry and business not found in whatever area is modeled , run mixed motive power far out of time step with any period modeled. Even this is fine, of course, but isn’t for me, personally.
I prefer to call the more possible and probable roads with researched backgrounds, holding to real towns and geography, etc., “Believable roads”
I think it really helps to show the modeler’s knowledge and forethought by evolving a good story built up around the road, based on a decent amount of study and research, on the modeler’s part, related to the area, geography, businesses, industry and other roads that actually ran or run in the region.
I recently cobbled up a one and a half page blurb on