Join the discussion on the following article:
Roundhouse HO 4-4-0 with dual-mode DCC and sound
I’ve seen this model and, with the exception of the DCC and sound installed, it is a typical, run-of-the-mill model from about 1975. The detail is pathetic; there is no external piping anywhere, not just the missing sand line from the sand dome. I’ll bet other manufacturers are anxiously getting tooling ready to do a model of the 4-4-0 the right way with the level of detail we hobbiests expect today. All they have to do is visit the Museum of Science & Industry in Chicago to see the real thing. It’s sure a lot better looking than the Roundhouse offering…
For What it’s worth, I’m still of the opinion that DCC has quite a ways to go yet, in comparison to the PFM Sound System. I have enough DCC and PFM equipped locos to make a judgement on the quality of the sound produced by each system. This is, of course, a personal view point. As far as detail is concerned, that can be added to any loco if the model is one you really like. Today, though, one does expect more detail than in the past.
A very smooth and quiet performer with good while not perfect sound. The only things missing are a better way (than the pot on the pc board) to adjust the volume, a crew, and a set of different length drawbars. I built a new one to get the engine and tender closer together. Other than that: sweet!
I have a DC model, no sound. It is plain looking, sparten, but it runs well and is a good hauler with 10 cars or so. Fits well into turn of the 20th century layouts. Looks good with branch-line commuter or short passenger trains.
I’ve only seen the publicity on this engine and have not had one in my hands BUT it’s hard to believe that a current manufacturer would put out such a crudly detailed engine at such an exorbitant price! What are they thinking? The Bachman Spectrum 2-8-0 and 4-6-0 are infinitely superior and much cheaper.
The 4-4-0 American was the most ubiquitous steam engine found on American railroads for over 50 years. So if you’re modeling the early 20th century, as I am, you can’t have too many of these. I’ve been thinking about getting Bachmann’s newest release but I’m disappointed it doesn’t include sound, so after reading this review I’m seriously considering purchasing one. In particular, it appear that it is fairly easy to remove the locomotive’s body from the running mechanism so it can be detailed and repainted.
A 4-4-0 without a tapered boiler ?Looks like it was tooled 30 years ago .I dont mind kitbashing but you might as well try from scratch rather than waste time with this thing .Walthers PROTO 2000 line, we need your help.Thanks bachmann.Send us another good generic 90’s unit.Athearn/Roundhouse should take note, many of us will spend the money but not for such a poor excuse of a model.
I agree with the majority of the review. This little engline has plenty of power but will stall at the slightest sign of a voltage drop,(i.e. dirty track) unlike the Atlas diesels which will run over anything. Also the front truck is a bit light and it helps to add some weight to keep it sure footed. Also the sound is a bit harsh and the lowest chuff setting is still to loud. All and all not a bad value. Only used on DCC.
This is not a bad engine. It runs/pulls well on either my home or club layout. If the lack of details bugs you, add it. Zero operating problems with it and no dirty track issues…in fact, it runs better at the club than a few engines that cost $100-$200 more. The sound distorts, but there are simple ways around that. Only unsolvable sound problem: chuff synch. I am not a techno-snob; I intend to buy more…
This locomotive appeals to me. I’m an older modeller, my fun in the hobby comes from changing a locomotive model into a specific locomotive using detail parts and effort. Anyone can spend the money and buy a high zoot model ready to run right out of the box, but it is still a model a million other modellers have as well. When I do the detail myself; I can carry it to any level that satisfies me and I always have a locomotive I know I will never see on anyone elses layout. I’m a modeller that started in the 1950’s; scratch building is a big part of what the hobby is to me.
Its great hobby isn’t it? We can all do it our way and still not be wrong.
From what I can see, Roundhouse have used exactly the same loco body, cab and tenders for their 4-4-0, 2-6-0 and 2-8-0 models. Only the chassis differs. Though there is a choice between coal and oil tenders depending on road. Am I right?