I am in the final stages of completing my new layout. It is landscaped and ballasted, and I have repeatedly checked my trackwork for derailments and unintended uncouplings. I do notice a few spots along the mainlines where locomotives seem to slow down a bit.
I understand that voltage under load is critical for accurate voltage testing. So, my question is, what is the most accurate way to check voltage under load along the mainlines?
OK, guys, thanks for the replies. But I am afraid in this case that I need to be treated as electronically illiterate. So, bear with me.
What you are telling me is that I should set my multimeter to a DC setting of, say, 25 volts and take a reading after doing one of two things.
One, I could lay a 15Ω 10 watt resistor across the two rails.
-or-
Two, use an 1156 automotive bulb, wired across the two rails.
Do I understand that correctly? Is the key here to wire a device, a resistor or an incandescent bulb, across the two rails in order to measure voltage under load at a specific point on the layout?
At our club we have a dedicated track tester that shows voltage. I don’t know who makes it – I’ll try to remember to nab a picture of it when I get to the club on Sat.
I do have a RRampMeter wired in-line for each of my two boosters. But, those two meters show constant voltage as locos move around the layout. I need to test voltage under load at specific points on the layout.
The automotive bulb is my favorite for testing wiring. I test with an Amp Meter measuring current through the bulb, which (as Mel stated) should be about 2 amps with both the brake light and tail light filaments illuminated.
I used my eyeballs to see if the lamp is bright.
This is called a dynamic electrical test, and it gives a much more complete picture than just checking the voltage (static electrical pressure) appllied to an open circuit, like track without a locomotive.
not sure how you tell from current if the voltage has dropped below your minimum.
it’s certainly easy to measure the voltage instead of current. if you measure 14.5VAC where the booster connects to the track and want a no less than a 2% drop, you want to measure 14.2VAC or better.
using circuit breakers or a lower power DCC system (PowerCab), wouldn’t you need to be able to test with something that draws less than 2A. i use a #211-2 T3 bulb that draws ~1A with my PowerCab
Use one of your HF meters on AC to check the DCC voltage. The voltage should be the same anywhere you check it on your layout.
The 1156 Automotive bulb is a single filament 12.8 volt 2.1 amp incandescent lamp.
Brand Philips Lighting
Model Number 1156B2
Energy Used 26.9 Watts
Volts 12.8
Base Single Contact Bayonet (BA15s)
Bulb Shape S-8
Candle Power 32
Bulb Finish Clear
Bulb Technology Incandescent
Average Rated Life (hr) 1200
Class and Filament C-6
Length (in) 2
Diameter (in) 1
GE 1156
Osram Sylvania 1156
Attach the bulb to the rails (I solder a short 2” piece of #18 AWG stranded wire to the bulb with alligator clips) then check the track voltage with a cheapo multimeter, AC range for DCC and DC range for DC layout.
Somebody posted elsewhere that an ordinary multi meter won’t measure DCC voltage. You can’t use the DC measuring setting. I had understood that the type of AC delivered by DCC also won’t show up on the AC setting of a regular multi meter.
Using a fixed resistance with a known value like a light bulb won’t tell you the actual voltage drop. You need a measuring device for that.
And apparently you can measure DCC voltage using the AC setting on a multi meter.
all you need is a relative measurement. in this case that the voltage is less than some value relative to some other measurement made on the RR with the same meter - as you also suggest (?!)
So for DC you apply a load and measure actual voltage with the multi meter on DC voltage setting to measure the voltage drop I.e. actual track voltage after load is applied.
For DCC you can use a multi meter on AC voltage setting to get a relative voltage drop but not actual track voltage. You measure without load and then with load. The difference is the drop even though you don’t have actual voltage in either case.
For DCC you need to get a reference voltage first, I.e. on a piece of track not subject to any load and known to be in good continuity with the power supply (booster) feeding that track section.
With a cheapy meter you more than likely do have the actual DCC voltage, or close enough, anyway. Lack of any sort of RMS processing on the AC voltage setting results in an accurate reading of the square wave. Peak of a square wave = RMS, so a simple peak readign meter will show the proper voltage. A basic RMS meter will not read correctly, as it is calibrated for 60Hz sine waves, and peak is square root of 2 times RMS for a sine. And fancier True RMS meters that can handle multiple wave shapes instead of just sine also report incorrectly because with few rare exceptions, they generally are only good to 100Hz. Way under the DCC frequency.
DC voltage on DCC track had best be as close to 0 as it gets - otherwise one of two things is happening. One, you are using a system that allows running a DC loco using address 00, and address 00 is selected on a throttle and the speed is not set to stop, or two, something is causing the booster to put out an offset signal - either the output drivers are failing, or the input signal is bad and the booster is simply faithfully amplifying the bad signal.
Digitrax recommends measuring DC between one rail and the common terminal (labeled ground on the systems) and adding the two. Both should be equal anless, as above, address 00 is not at speed 0, or something is broken, added together, they should equal the DCC voltage. But that can be difficult to do in the middle of the layout where a connection to the common might not be readily available.