This is the first I have heard of this problem. Will the effect RRs getting new rail or are the rail manufacturers locked in the processes of just making rail.? Might be a problem for replacement rail, new routes, or for any more double tracking ?
What the article is mentioning is steel sheet - used in the manufacture of consumer products - refrigerators, washers, dryers etc. That is also used in the manufacture of automobiles.
The article doesn’t really mention structural type steel such as rail. Secondly, the US carriers have been using foreign manufactured rail for decades.
Sheet steel products, like cladding for pole barns and commercial steel buildings are jumping up about 10% per month. When demand and pricing for one type of steel product go up, demand and prices for other types of steel products seem to go up as well.
In the USA, there are currently only 3 producers of steel railroad rail.
Evraz Rocky Mountain Steel (former CF&I) located in Pueblo, CO. They currently produce rail in standard 80 foot lengths, but recently announced plans to update the Pueblo mill and make 100 meter long (328 feet) strings of rail.
Steel Dynamics Inc (SDI) is the newest rail mill in the US located in Columbia City, IN. It began rolling rails in 2014 for Class I operations and can produce rail up to 320 foot lengths.
The final US rail mill is Cleveland Cliffs Steelton mill (formerly ArcelorMittal, and before that was Bethlehem Steel) located in Steelton, PA. They can roll rail in standard lengths of 80 feet.
While the Japanese rail maker Nippon Steel can produce longer rail at 480 foot, the US Class Is will soon have two domestic mills for long rail production without the added expense of overseas shipping.
A court upheld the tariffs early this month. Biden may or may not rescind the steel tariff. The time to assess the Japanese long-rail ‘advantage’ would be after the tariff is rescinded or perhaps reduced.
Since Biden has actually reimposed a metals tariff Trump lifted (in Arabia, on aluminum) that remains uncertain.
How much time from the inland waterway’s mouth on the Pacific Ocean to the vessel’s docking at Stockton? I don’t care about the time from Japan to the US Pacific Coast.
It’s fifty miles as the crow flies from Crockett (Carquinez Strait) to Stockton. Sixty-four by road. Possibly seventy-five miles up the San Joaquin River for the ship. It’s 45 miles from Antioch to Stockton in the channel. The channel is maintained to 35 feet and can handle ships up to 900 feet.
I’m guessing 10 knots tops in the channel, so 8-10 hours would be a reasonable estimate.
10 knots sould like a high speed for a ocean going vessel on a relatively narrow navigable waterway - with or without tugs.
Watched lakers navigate the Cuyahoga River to the mills in Cleveland - their speeds were in the 1 to 2 knot range - with tugs. Time spent passing a fixed point would be on the order of 5 to 8 minutes - depending upon size of the vessel.
Vessels that entered the river from Lake Erie bow first would then exit the river stern first.
A reasonable conclusion. I kinda picked 10 knots out of the air, anyhow.
Guidance for the St Lawrence Seaway is 6 knots in canals.
I believe I saw a video of a ship leaving Cleveland on the Cayuhoga River - there was a notch where the ship could turn (back in, pull out) so it went out bow first.
The video was run at several times normal, so I couldn’t get a sense of actual speed.
I’ve seen quite a few freighters in the Rouge River going to the Ford Rouge Plant. They all go slow but the captains who are “regulars” on the run are noticeably “faster” (a relative term).