I don’t know if anyone else does this :
When I like something, I tend to buy it twice.
So, I have 2 Lionel turbines, 2 Lionel 2025’s, and today I bought a second 2035
She is really clean cosmetically, with just one missing marker lamp
She is very free rolling, but will need all the usual servicing:
cleaning, brushes, tender pick up wires, etc…
No I wouldn’t do anything like that. Let’s see I have
five 224E’s
three 2359
Three 262’s
two 259’s
three 736’s
three 675’s
Three PA-1 NYC
Three PB-1 NYC
Should I go on? lol
Good evening all,
Well, I do have two 384E, one is a Lionel Classic and the other is a MTH.
Keep on training,
Mike C. from Indiana
Thank you, guys !
I guess I’m in great company, and I will consider this affirmation that this behavior is normal !
I just realized how many times I’ve bought the same engine twice, I guess I enjoyed it so much the first time !
Happy Easter !
Paul
Happy easter to you too, Yes it is very normal.
Nothing wrong with doubling-up Paul, if it’s something you like.
After all, they ain’t makin’ any more of 'em.
And Happy Easter everyone!
I’m in a different position, with Prewar multiples. I have 18 “Torpedo” 1688’s. The major reason is they are all different castings, from 1936-1942. No two are alike in the external castings, plus there were three distinct motors used during their production. An article reprint on the forum, in Timeless Classics, ran an article about the first issued 1688E, that had forward facing cab windows, unlike the rest of production. While searching to locate this elusive version, I noticed way more variations, than most people knew existed. I have every variation made. There has to be something wrong with my thinking. LOL.
It sounds like I’ve hit a nerve with this thread !
[(-D]we all must be suffering from the same affliction…
Teledoc,
can you tell me anything about this 1688 ?
My research has come up with '39 production. She only has a number plate on the left side.
Paul
well the first Lionel steamer I bought for myself was a 675 with the Baldwin drivers…then I got a later one with the sintered drivers…couple years ago at a show a guy had a box of parts that was a 2025 and a 2035. It took about 20 minutes to have them together enough to run again. The 2025 just needs a trailing truck to be complete, picked up a 675 truck at the last show. Right before that I piced up a 2025 shell…My second steamer I got was a 671 becaue I grew up watching my Uncle’s 2020 going around my Grandparents Christmas Tree…a few years ago I inheateted that 2020 when my Uncle passed. I had put a 224E together for myself, no I also have my Uncle’s 224E.
Paul, I put the year of production in the 1937-39 range, and from my original listings, it would be my #15. The motor is what I call the Type I motor, mounted through the running boards, just in front of the cab. The drivers are 12 spoke, and the tag on the motor says Lionel 027. The earliest 1936 issues, had the same style motor, but the drivers were only 8 spoke, with motor tagged “Lionel Jr.”, which was a holdover from earlier 4 wheel Junior line motors. The number tag is 1688, versus the earlier 1688E tags, but yours should have tags on both sides. The key to it being closer to the 1939 range, is the countersink hole on top of the loco, just forward of the cab, which is how the 1668 six wheel motors were mounted. The 1588 Clockwork, 1668/1668E, & the 1688/1688E all used the same basic mold, with minor modifications, throughout their production. The 1588 was 0-4-0, the 1688/E were 2-4-2, and the 1668 was a 2-6-2 arrangement. The 1688/1688E used three distinct motors, with first one having horizontal wing extension, that mounted the motor through the running boards, (Type I). The second motor was one of the versions used in a 1664 loco, which used a single 2 1/4" lateral screw, through the body, back near the cab, which is a (Type II), and the last version was identical to the Postwar 1654 motor, which used two lateral screws through the body, making that the (Type III). There are other body mold modifications that were made, from the early 1936 to 1942 version. ALL 1936 issued 1688/E were thin castings, and had an open cab without firebox doors, and all had “Lionel Jr.” motors, with 8 spoke drivers. In 1937, Lionel made the transition to “Lionel 027” motors, with 12 spoke drivers, and were now the Thick Casting, and the cabs now had firebox doors. I would guess that 98-99% of people think that all the 1688’s are common, with the exception of the very first issue that had open forward facing
Dave to my knowledge there is 5 different 675, which I have 3 of. Theres a version with alunimum smoke stack, and one with a black smoke stack, ( 2-6-2 ) 1947 - 1949. Then ther was another version ( 2-6-4 ) 1952. I don’t have acess to them right now to state which wheels they have. I really need to pull mine out and figure which ones I actually have.
Teledoc,
thank you, sir !
Very informative, never realized so many variations. Mine is a little rough shape, but glad to have it. Had to rebuild the E unit, but it runs great now, a little too great… gotta watch my speed on the curves!
Service complete !
new motor brushes
tender pick up wires
whistle brushes
running well,
whistlin loud and proud !
Paul, My main forum that I use is Model Train Forum, (MTF), where I did a complete write-up about the infamous Raymond Loewy “Torpedoes”, which explains all the variations of the three locos,(1588/1668/1688). It is listed in the Tinplate section, in that Forum. My research on these, will be added to the next book, that Bruce Greenberg, will be publishing in 2020. He did a new edition, covering Standard & 2 7/8” Trains, 1901-1929, back in 2015. His next edition covers 1930-1942, in 0 & 00 gauges. I met Bruce last October at York, where he photographed, some of my major variations of the 1688/E. He got quite an education about the “Torpedoes”, to say the least.
Teledoc,
thanks again ! I’ll look forward to reading your work !
Correct me if I’m wrong, but I read somewhere that there is a variation of 1688 with the number plate only on the left side ? I felt like mine was missing the plate until I read that. Have you come across this at all ?
Paul