Thank you for making a SOO F7 that I can simply put on the track and run. Thank you for making a CNW GP7 that I can simply put on the track and run. Thank you for making a MILWAUKEE GP9 that I can simply put on the track and run.
Because now, I can use my scarce modeling time to take an Atlas RS32 cab and build a MILW chop-nose RSC-2. I can use my scarce modeling time to kitbash a CNW ex-Katy Baldwin/EMD hybrid AS-616. I can use my scarce modeling time to convert a NW2 into a TR-2 turned into a slug (CNW BU-4).
Thank you for taking care of the ordinary stuff for me, so I can spend my time building some of the more exotic and characteristic models, because I don’t have to waste time trying to just get a GP7 to look decent and run well.
Well put, Michael. You didn’t mention, but could have, the increasing amount of prototype accuracy (detail, paint jobs, and numbers) in those models that you can simply put on the track and run, which allows more time for other priorities.
Wholly agreed. Availability of high-quality RTR models in no way detracts from actual modeling for me either. I can devote time and effort to building other things and making a layout that looks more complete. In inflation-adjusted prices, the RTR stuff isn’t even a greater expense than what it used to cost me to kitbash, detail, paint, decal, remotor and do all the other work that used to be necessary to build an accurate loco or car.
And not everybody’s a craftsman. Today’s nicer models make a level of prototype accuracy that used to be available only to dedicated kitbashers or scratcbuilders accessible to hobbyists of any skill level. For those who want to do the extra work, there’s still plenty of opportunity with today’s scratchbuilding supplies, details, and craftsman kits.
Ditto… I totally agree with this sentiment. Similar to Rob, I am building an OPs based layout to the finest detail I can muster. High quality rtr helps a lot in this area…Now if Bachmann would just come out with a small prairie in the spectrum line…
The RTR is helpful but I still add more correct details example athearn sd40-2 rtr the dust bin is smaller than should be the hood side blower bulge is smaller, don’t get me wrong they are great engines i just want that little bit closer look but there are a few other eye’s that i left alone as good enough. So yes thank you RTR
Agreed. I like building things, but strangely mostly 1/24 scale autos or HO-scale structures. When it comes to trains, I prefer to operate, rather than manufacture, locos and cars. Besides, with my slow pace and limited time I would have only 1 engine and 2-3 cars by this point in my MRR “career”.
[quote user=“Caribou22”]
The RTR is helpful but I still add more correct details example athearn sd40-2 rtr the dust bin is smaller than should be the hood side blower bulge is smaller, don’t get me wrong they are great engines i just want that little bit closer look but there are a few other RTR’s that i left alone as good enough. So yes thank you RTR
Like many, I don’t have much time for my hobby and right now most of it is going towards building benchwork, laying track, wiring, scenery etc. so I simply don’t have time to assemble all my rolling stock from kits, although I do build a few here and there. So thanks!
Yes, both of my Athearn MILW GP9’s run and sound great!! As well as my one 40-2.
The six bright yellow MILW Road grain hoppers built by Intermountain look at excellent behind the SD9’s, and the Walthers rib side caboose look great following up from the rear.
My rendition of Milwaukee Roads Golden Triangle Grain Train is all RTR, which gives me more time to converting my Bachmann Shay to a two truck, and modifying a Bachmann chassis to work under a Roundhuse Climax and boxcar shell.