[:(] Okay, so it didnt work the first time. That was the prototype, next one will be perfect. We have all been there Ian, thats what makes this hobby so great.[^]
All the best
Ian P
Dont know about how that spur would work any overhead support cables but an elegant bridge it looks like it would have been.
Ian , is that white wall a garden wall or the side of the house? what happens if a train stalls in the space between? Do you have access?
Gentlemen
Thank you for your interest, and your encouragement, Ian.
That spur is not a spur that is the main line and it will continue on around some curves and join up with the main circuit some 10 metes down line, near Vampires tunnel.
The white wall is the pump house for the pool and it divides area 3 from area 2 and if you look down the bottom their is a train coming out of the pumphouse tunnel and we have had hundreds of transits both ways with no trouble.
We are intending to make ita double decker tunnel and we will have a second connection between area 2 and 3 and we expect no trouble up there either.
We printed out some photos of the bridge and have had a change of heart and am considering trying to make it work.
We were wondering if anyone thought it was worthwhile and also how can we get more room on the bridge or more likely more turning room, we are concerned about overhangs.
We are also concerned that a modern elegant bridge like that, may look out of place next to a supposedly 100 year old viaduct. We love to put the old and the new together but unsure in this instance.
Any advice would be appreciated/
Regards ian
Hi Ian
Great concept on the bridge.
OK so you did not finish it because you thought somthing was not quite right.
Fix what ever it is you think is wrong next time round as it will make an interesting feature
Have a look at some bridges that have points on them that should show you if what think is correct a double bow string bridge with points on it what a gem of an idea[^]
But do make sure of your acsess to pump house pass
regards John
Ian,
Chop the viaduct back a couple of arches mate, give you more room to work with and consider a trestle, there’s one in the states - the Keddy ‘Y’ or something like that - with a left hand switch on the trestle.
Cheers,
Kim
[tup]
Ian, Here is a pic of a bridge that I built. Not sure it would work with your application, but, with a few modifications to the bridge or your fence it might. I’d like to see more pics of your layout. Do you have them posted anywhere?
Ian, I second Rusty G’s suggestion. I, too, would love to see more pictures of your railway!!!
SandyR
The bridge that never was…wih a spur to nowhere! [:)] I like it!
underworld
[:D][:D][:D][:D][:D]
Gentlemen;
What some of you have said, actually most of what has been said is in our minds.
That remark about getting rid of a few arches of my viaduct will cost you a few beers Kim, when I get over there; no we do not want to do that unless we have too. The idea of modifying the fence has occured to us and if we must we must, but that will be a last resort.
What we have decided to do is to remove the arches and complete the bridge without them but we will paint the arches and be ready to use them once we are happy with the bridges operation wihout them.
To complete the bridge we have added 25 mm sides to it to hold the ballast, drilled 6 mm weep holes in its base, as we have done with our ramps. We then painted the lot with a thick grey paving paint as well, we have painted the insides of the weep holes using a cotton bud. The base of the bridge is now in place and we have worked out that we neeed to put 2 pylons underneath it to give us better rigidity and be in keeping with the other work we have done elsewhere.
We are waiting on two R3 electric points I bought on ebay and another shipment of track. When they arrive we will connect the whole thing up and try to run our Mallet over it as far as we can, and observe same carefully.
Some of the ideas we have to make it fit and work is :
a) cut off the rear arch and attach it to the fence post.
b) raising both the arches and possibly move them to the left.
3) cut a bit out of the fence post so that the rear of the Mallet will not foul it when turning.
Any ideas that anyone has will be appreciated.
What you ghad to say Underworld did not fill me with confidence that you are seriously considering this matter. And it is a serious and interesting subject.
Regards
ian
Ian,
Do you have any drawings??? Looks rather odd to me. Even a mock up in cardboard would be great to see as you see it finished. Rgds eh…Brian.
Brian mate; do you think the bridge looks odd with the viaduct? If you do this is the feedback we are looking for, we thought so ourselves but when we saw an actual print of the photo, it looked pretty good.
Since we have painted it and roughly put the rest of the support material in place it looks entirely different and Doreen is pretty kean to carry on with what we are doing, not so sure myslef though.
I dont have any drawings but I do have a template of the bridge and the arches; we do a lot of this; make a cardboard template first then see if it fits and how it works. Then Doreen transfers the matrix onto marine ply and I cut it out with my jigsaw (saber saw)
it has worked for us with just about all the curves and ramps we have done so far!
The actual proportions of the “Goodwill Bridge” is 475 m long, arches 100 m above the deck and the deck is 13 m above the Brisbane River. I think you will find out a fair bit about it on the internet if you look under Goodwill Bridge; Brisbane from that you will see the actual concept from which we drew our ideas.
Rgds ian
Ian,
Something is not quite right with it’s location. From what I see the high arch looks good with the viaduct but not against the wall. I’m thinking a painted backdrop needs to be there or a shrub to hide the wall. A scene like that would fair well in the wide open. I’m picturing a viaduct on both sides of the arch bridge. For that particular scene the wall of the (shed? or pumphouse?) brings what was flowing nicely to an abrupt halt. Make sense??? Definately a unique structure for a RR. Rgds eh…Brian.
Brian I must agree, in the middle of the viaduct would have been terrific but it is too late to do that now and I’m sorry.
We can get panels that will fit each fence panel painted for about $150 each by some “alternative” people nearby and they suggested a rain forest.
If we wrap it around both ends it should change things a lot for the better.
I was thinking about your layout the other day and something like this could look ok! That is why i gave the idea of getting a look at the original bridge itself. Get into Google and look up Goodwill Bridge Brisbane.
Thanks again for your view and suugestions I need some more like it, that is what this forum should be all about!
Rgds Ian
Well people;
i got no more views or interest and this compares unfavourably with Vics ever shrinking subject. It would appear that most people on this forum are more interested in “not doing something” rather than “doing something”.
However I have made considrable headway with this subject and with Troys help will be posting some new pics soon, and I hope I can stir up some interest in a very interesting and challenging part of Garden Railways. I am actually doing something and overcoming problems that you all may face in the future if you ever get to having reasonable layout.
Rgds ian
Ian,
Would it be possible to position the turnout and the curved base for it closer to the pump house wall? From the looks of it if you could gain a few cm like 10 or so the over hang wouldn’t be a problem.
Another theory make the arches longer and taller to keep the shap but let them start up closer to the viaduct.
Keep us posted, I really like to see you work.
Jack
Ian, I DO like this bridge! I am just curious about the spur as I have never seen anything like this before.
underworld
[:D][:D][:D][:D][:D]
I’m a little put off by this comment, I have to ask, just why does it matter so much that the view count is lower than you thought it would be compared to a topic thats been active for almost a year? Seams an unfair comparison.
As I have said before, no is more surprised by the number of hit on my thread than I am, but also remember that it has been actively updated for almost 1 year, and as for “not doing something” I had to tear out half my layout, then replan everything left and then rebuild what I had, I ended up doing 3 major rebuilds over the course of the last year tyring to fit the best possible operational type layout into a very tight space, it takes more planning than just laying a loop down in the backyard, if thats “not doing something” then I’d hate to see an idea of what “doing something” is…
Also my thread was meant to demonstrate doing large scale in a small space, much smaller than most consider do-able for G gauge trains, I suspect its that aspect and the fact that I ended up posting close to 10 variations of plans, from loop to point-to-point, all in a small area , that has drawn the most interest, as that is what I have recieved the most positive comments on.
Personally if everyone stopped reading my thread, I wouldnt sweat it, its there for me to keep track of the changes and progress I’ve made, thats why I posted it. If others get something out of it, thats good but thats not why I posted it.
Has anyone been looking at my Class A Climax building log?, no, not really, or my Bachmann’LGB Porter ba***hread? same deal, a few comments, some hits, then zip. I dont worry about it, it will end
Ian, I must have missed this thread altogether some how. Anyway I think the bridge would look fine attached at the Viaduct where it is. However i think if it were me I would put the switch on the viaduct right before the bridge andfork the viaduct with it’s pier in between the lower two tracks. more believable in my opinion. Also this would inable a larger radius going into the curve.
Jack, thanks for the idea but it is very hard to change that now and in any case i think It will affect my 1.1 m Radius curve, and I have very little room overall. Mat and the same to you only in reverse.
Vic, this is not a critique of you or your thread, nor do i care about appeal, more an observation of the level of outlook of many of the people on this forum. Please don’t take offence about this something else maybe but not this.
Underground: i cannot understand your thinking for the life of me; I understood it more when I read you live in an apartment block, so you must have very little experience with anything to do with garden railways, truly who would have a spur 200 mm long, what would you do with it? i guess this is why you have never seen anything like it and the same to you Vic.
I have two concerns and thay are both to do with larger running stuff.;
-
As my Mallet curves to the right it has a fair outhang out the back and i am concerned that its left rear section will hit the fence post or the rear of the left arch.
-
Many of my larger carriages, ie the ICE train and the Golden Mountain have a lot of swing between the bogies (trucks) and it will foul the rear part of the right hand arch.
To this end I intend to get the whole thing working without the arches and then try to add them.
Further to this business about the spur line, I have already said the small branch to the right is just the beginning of my main line and it will be a circular track 40 m long, so it is hardly a spur. Most of this circle is already finished.
I have already done the geometry and it looks ok but it is marginal and I will keep you all informed as i go. Troy will post the pictures for me. Social responsibilities aside I hope to have something in a week.
Rgds Ian
And thanks fpor the interest and please keep your thinking caps on.