Speaking of T-1’s, I read they could haul 25 heavyweight passenger cars at 100 mph. They were some engines. Very big and very fast. They would spin their wheels as they started to haul eastbound trains out of Chicago. The economics of E7 diesels resulted in their demise.
Back to thread’s topic… again, that’s a really good model of the challenger.
Darth, what is the minimum radius she’ll negotiate? (Mechanically, not aesthetically.) Also, it looks like there’s a rhinestone headlight. Would the casting need to be drilled out to mount a bulb or LED?
It’s amazing when you think that these kits that are at least 40 years old can still produce such a convincing model (with plenty of skill and hard work, of course [swg]).
Thanks everyone for the replies.[:D] Heavyweights it is. I’ll probably go with either Bachmann’s or the ones Athearn makes for Bowser at the moment (Walthers suggests 24" minimum radius for their cars, and I have 22").
bb4884, the 4th, 5th and 6th tender axles are all blind for tight curves.
MidlandPacific, when you do get around to making that K-11, I bet it will turn out just as well as the 2-10-2 did.[:D]
ShadowNix, no DCC yet, partly because I have a small layout which I usually only run one engine at a time on.
My only tip on painting would be to only put on detail parts that don’t cross two areas with different colors, which will make it easier to mask, and when you get around to putting the other parts on, you won’t have to paint them while they’re on the engine.
Dave Vollmer, thanks for the extra detailed info on the T1 passenger cars.[:D]
SteamFreak, the minimum radius it can take is 18", but the front of the boiler has an overhang of over 1" on curves like that.
The headlight and marker light lenses are all jewels, but the brass headlight that comes in the super-detail kit is designed so it can be easily drilled for a small light bulb.
The Challenger was the one die-cast loke I always wanted to do but never did. Shortly before I went to 'Nam in '69 I had completed a Cary/Mantua Pacific - I had previously completed a Cary/Mantua Mikado - and when I got a concurrent assignment to Germany the first thing I did when I got there was order a Challenger and the superdetail kit. It was out of stock - give Bowser credit - since they could not ship the Challenger they did not ship a superdetail kit and my American Express Money Order accompanied their letter of explanation. I turned right around and ordered a PRR N-2/USRA Santa Fe which became my third die-cast locomotive. I continued to build die-cast lokes while overseas and then when I rotated in '73. First thing I did when I got to the Azores in '77 was order a Challenger, and son-of-a-gun, it was once again out of stock and my check was returned to me. Never did get one built; as I gaze upon the photographs of your completed unit I wax nostalgic for those old HO Scale days.
Had I completed one I probably - that is really a far-fetched ‘maybe’ because there were other issues involved - would have remained in HO Scale and been there still.
By the way, that Monogram tender from their static model came available between my first and second order; one of the things which prompted me to place the second order was a conversion article in one of the hobby magazines. A friend of mine from the model railroad club I had belonged to in Massachusetts had a ‘Centipede’ tender from a UP Northern which had taken a plunge into ‘Bottomless Canyon’ and which he was willing to part with for twenty five bucks. I, naturally, didn’t acquire the tender since I had not acquired the engine; I gave some thought to re-ordering a Challenger when Bowser began advertising it in their ads again but by that time my acquaintance in Massachusetts had died and I didn’t have th
Paul W. Beverung, thanks for the comment on the photography.[:D] It can be hard to get clear pictures in close-ups like those, and I ended up having to re-take most of those photos because the originals were so blurry.
I’m not completely sure what’s next, but my ##th birthday is in a week, so there’s a chance I’ll get a PRR B-6 0-6-0 (it’s the #2 most wanted thing on my list). If I don’t get one, then my next kit will most likely be a PRR L-1 Mikado, but that will be a while off, since the next engine I want to buy is a Rivarossi 2-6-6-6.[:D]
AggroJones, I bet it could even outpull a Lionel!!
I think we all have our patience in different areas. Mine’s in kit buidling, and yours is obviously in detailed weathering. I don’t have nearly enough patience for really detailed painting.
Nice dirty Challenger.[:D] Is that an Athearn?
spikejones52002, I had the same siderod binding problems with my K-11 and T-1. All you need to do to fix it is to enlarge the holes slightly until everything moves freely, which really isn’t hard to do at all.[:D] Once that’s done, I’m sure you can have your Challenger up and running in no time![:D]
Well Done! Congratulations. I can only hope that when I’m finished with my Garratt it looks as good as, and runs as well as, your Challenger does. I might post a few photos when I finish.
I’d have to say the Challenger is by far the nicest and most attractive wheel arrangement going. You’ve done youself and the hobby proud. Excellent job!!!