Since members seem determined to discuss the Ukraine war on this Forum, please do so in this thread only. Other threads will be deleted.
And I know it’s difficult, but keep politics out of this thread. Any “This is because Biden is weak” or “Trump is a Russian patsy” stuff will be deleted, and repeated offenses will result in penalties. Also be warned that if this thread degenerates into insults or fights, it’s gone the second that editing it becomes not worth my time.
FWIW, the first thread that you deleted looked just like a “little red riding hood” thread to me as well, complete with the wolf disguised as grandma. So I support your original decision, completely.
Also saw a fairly good sized DODX movement heading east on the NS H-D a couple nights ago. I have no idea if this is directly related to the subject, but it sure seems like it’d be a mighty sweet coincidence, if it was not.
There did not appear to be any insults or flaming, political or otherwise. Yet you don’t want any discussion of this topic, even on a pre-approve thread. Why?
Rail-related question. Is the Ukraine rail system UIC (European) gauge or Russian wide gauge?
Aren’t we talking just a strong 1/8" here (4 mm)? Wouldn’t the trains of either country work on each other’s tack?
Are you sure that Russia’s gauge isn’t actually 1520 mm and it’s just been called 5’ gauge for so long that nobody gave it any thought? Since most of the tracks were put in place by the former Soviet Union, I’d bet they’re all the same.
Let’s see. Previous threads where some attempted to discuss the impacts a war might have on railroads were locked up by the moderator, who said they were off-topic for discussing a war. Now we have a thread created by the same moderator for the specific purpose of discussing a war, and right out of the gate the discussion veers off-topic into railroads. It’s as if Seinfeld merged with The Office.
I’d like to think that Vlad Putin would be a big proponent of PSR if he became the CEO of a major North American Railroad,…but then I am somewhat of a sentimentalist. [B)]
Interesting. I thought the Russians chose five-foot gauge because an even five feet makes a little more sense than four feet, eight-and-one-half inches. At least when you think about it.
Here is a cab ride video on a passenger train in the Carpathian Mountains of Ukraine. It zips right along on the twisting, hilly track. It gives quite a feel for living in this sparsely populated area.
Interestingly, at least portions of the track, rather than having staggered rail joints, have joints laid square, or in other words, the joints are aligned. As discussed before here, there are pros and cons for each method. If you look the video at time starting 19:00 for instance, you can see the rail joints coming at you in pairs. Each pair being struck by the wheels makes a relatively louder click than hitting one joint at a time with staggered joints.
The second half seems to have more variety of wayside details, high bridges, tunnels, and more population density, buildings, etc. The train seems to be moving quite fast through these more congested areas.
It’s just a number, so there’s no real sense in either measurement. If you think about it, maybe the early British had it right with Isambard Kingdom Brunel’s 7’-0 1/4" broad gauge.
I have never seen any discussion of Russian (or, in the iron-curtain days, “associated” country) railroads that used a metric gauge other than 1524mm.
I find it hard to believe 4mm would make or break the ability of Russian stock to be used as part of an invasion force – or for Ukrainian stock to be abstracted to Russia over Russian ‘metals’.
The Erie started out at six feet. Made for plenty of clearance and nice, wide curves when they changed over to “standard gauge.”
There are many theories about why 4 feet, eight and a half inches came about, with probably the most popular, of course, having to do with Roman chariots. One theory is as good as another, I suppose. I don’t know that anyone ever actually recorded that “we chose 4’ 8.5” because…
I expect that U.S. railroads and all other facets of our society will be greatly affected by the conflict breaking out in Eastern Europe. I believe there is a high likelihood that we will be drawn into the conflict.
The world may coalesce around the premise that we cannot let this happen to those under attack because that is not who we are. Wars create their own gravity. Due to our technical abilities of this age, wars are becoming harder to evaluate and react to. For instance, say we get hit by a massive cyber-attack. Will we know and agree on who was responsible?