The attached photograph showing “a triple rainbow” was sent by a trusted friend, whose friend wrote that is shows a triple rainbow in Israel, where I live. I’m certain it’s the result of digital manipulation.
I have two good reasons. Can a reader state them?
On the other hand, examples of my “electronic darkroom” work:
Actually three. The reversal of color (or should I say the non-reversal from primary to secondary in the image?) and the non-justifiable offset of the third bow are the most significant, but the angle between primary and secondary would be wrong, too.
I have in fact seen true triple rainbows, and the third bow is very close to one of the others and you have to look carefully to distinguish it.
Multiple rainbows are always concentric (share a common center), so the one that is offset to the left is phoney. The other two appear to have some concentricity, but are offset vertically, so one or the other is also phoney.
I have done enough photo manipulation to know how easy it is to do anything to a photo… I no longer accept “photo proof” of anything. I have changed eye color in a photo of a person, put faces of relatives on movie star bodies, inserted (or removed) people into/from a group setting. The only thing I have not been able to do successfully is change a person’s race.
I saw a quadruple rainbow one fall in Michigan after a strong, cleansing rain. It was more like a tunnel of color. Definitely not like that first shot.
I’ve seen photo postcards showing rural stations with crowds that would be rare at best at said locations. Careful inspection usually shows the seam where two photos - one of the station and one of the crowd - were joined.
Overmod, Firelock, and Semper are all Correct. Nature’s ways of creating rainbows precudes their intersecting. The reason not mentioned so far is that no news sevice reaching me had anything about any rainbow at the time. Thanks.