The FY 2007 Budget and Railroads

The Administration released its *PROPOSED FY 2007 Budget this morning, February 6, 2006. To view the Budget go to OMB’s web site: www.whitehouse.gov/omb/budget/fy2007 where you can click on, and download The President’s Budget Message, and then click on the Department of Transportation. To get the tables with the FY 2007 numbers you need the CD-ROM which is only available with the hard-copy budget document. There are two items of interest to railfans in the FY 2007 Budget.

  1. Proposed Elimination of the DOT Railroad Rehabilitation and Improvement Low Cost Loan Program
    The reasons for eliminating this program are there are no justifications to extend favorable loan terms to private companies, taxes on diesel fuel have been eliminated, and the Government would have to cover any unsecured losses which could be significant in case of a loan default.

  2. Reforming Passenger Rail Service
    In a 2005 assessment of Amtrak the Administration called for significant reforms in curbing losses in its FY 2006 Budget message, and while the Administration feels some progress has been made more needs to be done. In its FY 2007 Budget Message the Administration states Amtrak can no longer maintain the “status quo,” it must reduce costs. The FY 2007 Budget Message quotes part of a December 3, 2005 editorial in the Washington Post – normally friendly toward Amtrak – with Secretary Mineta’s position to only fund passenger service that makes sense. The Administration proposes to give Amtrak to $900 million for FY 2007, and that is broken down into $ 500 million for capital costs - such as upgrading the Northeast Corridor – and $ 400 million for operating costs in discretionary grants contingent on Amtrak’s making the necessary reforms. One of the suggested cost reductions is to phase out the long distance – overnight- passenger trains while others are to overhaul the money-losing on-board food and beverage services and address Amtrak’s high labor costs.

  3. My take On All of This. <

Food and beverage service on passenger trains has never been profitable, and this goes back to the so-called golden age of railroading. Dining car service was viewed as a necessary amenity and may have been considered a loss leader of sorts.

Rudy: The overnight trains arew needed if you want taxpayer dollars going to the NEC. No trains in places like MN & WI = no support from those states’ representatives for taxpayer money towards the NEC.

From the URPA web site ( www.unitedrail.org ) :
“Follow the money” is the mantra of many who are trying to get to the bottom of why some people and/or companies behave in a certain way. Amtrak is no exception to this rule. Below is a brief chart of Amtrak statistics from Fiscal Year 2004, the last complete year of information posted on the Amtrak web site (It’s too early for figures from FY 2005, which just ended at the end of September, 2005). Take a look at the figures, and follow below for analysis.
State Ridership Expenditures Employment Payroll Notes
Alabama 48,466 $11,477,849 24 $1,224,391
Arizona 76,424 $952,736 36 $1,561,816
Arkansas 23,814 $199,260 32 $1,802,173
California 9,332,501 $29,649,815 3,589 $154,921,344 [1]
Colorado 200,693 $18,998,202 94 $5,558,480
Connecticut 1,392,393 $9,963,185 636 $34,428,828
Delaware 753,055 $5,109,985 1,173 $53,053,041 [2]
Florida 913,553 $13,689,114 990 $43,924,411
Georgia 142,965 $8,402,900 83 $3,943,655
Idaho 4,932 $51,537 3 $162,802
Illinois 3,065,680 $56,759,840 2,016 $83,493,489
Indiana 102,754 $19,762,401 1,036 $41,356,652 [3]
Iowa 54,365 $180,321 13 $572,091
Kansas 31,549 $15,639,008 26 $1,213,867
Kentucky 6,740 $6,428,567 6 $296,870
Louisiana 180,475 $4,256,976 363 $14,212,305
Maine 161,469 $972,711 24 $1,186,968
Maryland 1,779,141 $22,142,799 2,609 $126,689,216
Massach

I am surprised they gave any $ to Amtrak they must of been sick of all the ciritizim during there attemt to kill it in the FY2006 Budget.

I would be interested in knowing how many forum members have been able to make use of the student loan program for post secondary education. (college, tech or trade schools). Cuts are proposed for that program, medical assistance, Medicare and just about every domestic program in existance.

Be careful what you wish for.

three of my children are currently in college thanks to the student load program. All chose to go to school after working in other careers - a baker, a warehouse worker, and a nanny. They plan to become , respectively, an electrical engineer, physical therapist, and an engli***eacher.

dd

There is one more railroad related item of interest - according to the local paper, the '07 budget includes authorization to spend $490 million over the next 12 years to implement commuter rail between Ogden and Salt Lake City. UP and BNSF will benefit as some monies will be used to correct operational issues in Salt Lake and Ogden yards that would prevent commuter rail operations through those yards. This was one of 5 project funded. I don’t know what the other projects are.

dd

PS - thanks for the great information and analysis

I always thought they should contract out the food service on the trains anyway. Can you imagine a Starbucks franchise on the an Acela train, or McDonalds on the Autotrain? It could be a short menu like some of the airport venues. You could even put a couple of small ones in the current food service car with a little remodeling.