The power plant I work for is owned by a large utility that owns several coal power plants. The utility publshes a monthly magazine for its employees to keep them up to date on general company news and other business sectors they may not be afiliated with. This month’s magazine had it’s feature story on coal. It resembed Mark Hemphill’s article on commodities of the Rio Grande (although solely on coal in this case), but from the viewpoint of the end user - the power utility. I thought some of you might find it interesting, so I retyped it here. I apologize for the length, but I wanted to include it all. It includes mention of the rail transport in the second half of the article.
This article was written in Exelon’s monthly company magazine (December '04). Keep in mind it was written by employees of a power company, for employees of a power company, but I thought it had some neat information in it from the other end of the tracks.
BLACK GOLD
In today’s highly competitive business of electric generation, companies
such as Exelon Generation only make money if their generation assets are online and producing electricity at a price the market finds acceptable.
With both oil and natural gas reserves needing to be increasingly imported
from other countries at escalating prices, a number of electric generation
companies have again looked to the United States’ enormous domestic coal supply as a way to lower their overall fossil fuel costs.
Considering that point, it is no wonder why 51 percent, or nearly 2 million
gigawatthours, of the nation’s electricity was generated by the use of coal as a
fuel source in 2003. Exelon Generation, which alone used more than 7.75 million tons of coal last year, is no exception.
Why Coal?
"Just like you would want to diversify your stock portfolio, we want to
diversify our fuel portf