The truth comes out at last!
Well THAT just made my day! I’m CRUSHED! [:'(]
Next you’ll be telling us there’s no Easter Bunny…
There is also this…
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v2ul4EBfWMA
Note the video maker’s view of on line fora…
Peter
I guess that’s why they were confined to the asyl…I mean…island…of Sodor! [swg]
Thomas trying to punch above his tonnage rating and beyond his range.
I liked one comment where the person said they were so useless that some lasted over 60 years.
Jeff
Well, I am useless, and I have lasted 75 years so far.
Solomon’s reference discusses in some detail why the locomotives lasted nearly sixty years. It sure wasn’t fitness, even to intended purpose.
There is a similar range constraint in the PRR V1s, which promised to move wartime trains at considerable speed… about a hundred miles before draining the largest cistern PRR could field.
What I can’t figure out is the oscillations. Britain didn’t want for long-wheelbase 0-6-0s happily capable of 60mph, and in push-pull service to boot.
Note also that in the era these were being built, PRR was getting high-30s-mile range from more capable locomotives WITHOUT FIRING in the interim… one wonders if a proper boiler design would have let that 3T bunker and 5000 gallons do Really Useful Work…
Solmon’s reference discusses in some detail why the locomotives lasted nearly sixty years. It sure wasn’t fitness, even to intended purpose.
There is a similar range constraint in the PRR V1s, which promised to move wartime trains at considerable speed… about a hundred miles before draining the largest cistern PRR could field.
What I can’t figure out is the oscillations. Britain didn’t want for long-wheelbase 0-6-0s happily capable of 60mph, and in push-pull service to boot.
Note also that in the era these were being built, PRR was getting high-30s-mile range from more capable locomotives WITHOUT FIRING in the interim… one wonders if a proper boiler design would have let that 3T bunker and 5000 gallons do Really Useful Work…
I think someone needs to get to the root of the base canard inherent in Billinton’s middle name, which I think has been a but… I mean bit imaginatively respelled. It ought to be the Polish spelling of ‘Boskovski’ – the ‘butz’ and ‘kopf’ don’t fit the likely etymology, and for those who know even fractured German the result is, dare I say, unfortunate…
I am morally opposed to making fun of the person who did the Remembrance tanks.
52 years and 8 months here and I had a hoodie that proclaimed I was “useless” in full embroidery! [(-D]
Becky, sounds like you were born around my 15th birthday, so I’v been able to practice being useless a decade and a half longer.
My youngest son was into Thomas when he was younger and I would occasionally read some of the railway stories as part of the night time ritual. He will be starting his senior year at Purdue in a couple of months.
How about a red Star Trek uniform shirt emblazioned with “expendable?”
Funny how that changed around Wrath of Kahn and then came back with the most recent trilogy. Red shirt guy got a reprieve!
It hurts when you use those in the same sentence.
I’d heard about this before. I think it’s kind of an open secret in British railfanning.
On the whole, I want to say that British rail engineering took a different approach from that in the United States. Outside a few standouts like Pennsy, U.S. railroads defaulted to major manufacturing firms to design and produce locomotive classes (with the roads obviously providing heavy input on what they wanted). One of the results of this is that America generally (although there were definitely some notable exceptions - especially in the late 19th and earlier 20th century) did not produce entire classes of engines that were grossly flawed. This is in marked contrast to Britain, where much of the locomotive design and development was done in-house on railway lines (at least before consolidation under BR), typically under the auspices of a single authority figure. And if this figure was wrong about something, a whole class might end up being built that was junk.
I’m not trying to dish on Britain, because a) some of the greatest all-time steam designs originated from this practice, and b) the U.S. still skunked things all the time, and in a lot of different ways. But it seems like I’m always reading about whole batches of British locomotives that were essentially unusuable, and then seeing the same chief designer(s) names coming up. Where as here in the states, you couldn’t typically shake a finger at one single person and say “yeah, he designed that crap class of engines that nobody wanted.”
That is true what you say. In the U.S. it didn’t seem like there were any famous locomotive designers like William Stanier or Nigel Gresley.
Off the top of my head, Mathias Forney, Axel Vogt, Samuel Vauclain, William Woodward, William Mason, Ephraim Shay, Paul Kiefer - Americans all.
…and John Pilcher!
And Voyce Glaze!!
(Isn’t it “Matthias” and “Woodard”?)
Otto Jableman would be on that list.