I know that Southern Pacific and RIo Grande were the only roads who bought D40T-2s new. I heard in another forum however that the Clichfield had considered buying them but canceled the order. Can anyone verify this? DId any other roads consider purchasing them as well?
Also, anyone know how many railroads currently use 40T-2s/45T-2s? I understand they were scattered around the continent, but to what extent
Add RailAmerica’s Kyle to that list and keep in mind that those rascals are ballasted extra-heavy. No shortline w/ bad track is going to have them around very long.
Because rate-of-pay depended upon weight on drivers, the weights of SP’s T-2’s and the other 6-axle 40’s and 45’s stuck in my human RAM.
Between 391000 and 411000 lbs. Most of the 40’s including the T-2’ were low 390’s; a dozen 40’s were 411. Most of the 45"s include the T’s were 407 to 410. Not sure but I think I included the SDP-45s in that 410 along with SD-45Xs. Is that ballasted extra heavy?
These weights were for wage determination and required weighing the engines with full complement of stores supplies and consumeables—fuel, sand, lube oil…corpulent crew members had no effect.
What SP was fighting when the T-2’s were brought in as combatants were EMD’s running hot with alarm bells ringing hot engine lights burning and with 40’s engines de-rating to Run 6 which could cause the train to stall in a tunnel where, and dig this----
a thermocouple on a fireman’s armrest of the fourth unit of a U33C test train on the mountain in a tunnel indicated over 180 degrees; And the de-rating temp’s were 206 degrees
Advantage: better cooling from the GE’s lower air intake for the cooling system. Cool down between tunnels did it.