Ugly by design or neglect? The Chef’s picture is of an old neglected but still classic “northeast” caboose. Designed by the Reading and duplicated (even in wood sides) by many a road, including American Flyer!!!
Shortline home-builts and a few manufacturer’s products were really bad boxes on wheels. In my opinion, the largest class of ugly cabooses were those NYC jobs with low car bodies and large cupolas. For some reason NYC fans seem to revere them. I suppose that any fan of a particular road loves almost anything unique to it.
I remember seeing these RI homemades in local switching and transfer service in Chicagoland years ago. Instead of a cupola or bay windows they had an “open air” bench seat mounted on the roof of the car. If I can remember where to find a picture of one of these “beauties” I’ll post it for all to see.
These employees seem to have have settled into their little caboose for the “live long day”. Ten to eighteen hours worth I’d bet. They probably paid the photographer to record their friendship in this time and place. I doubt the railroad would have gone to the trouble because it doesn’t look like good (maybe 1922) PR on the B&A. Could the Boston & Albany have had such a low numbered caboose back then?
I like the guy in the window who is maybe minding the bacon, eggs and beans, and the “arms akimbo” proud conductor (?), and the guy with thumbs in his lapels. The whole crew is frozen in time and their biographies were perhaps not written but are wide open for speculation.
Never mind the lousy proportions and (could it be?) tin shingle siding. This was their place to show off their pride in what they did to keep the show going.
At first sight I thought this was example of graffiti ugly, and not counting as an ugly caboose. On my second view I saw the vehicle as a freshly painted, practical solution to an immediate problem where esthetics didn’t matter. This honest rebuild is still an ugly specimen and almost deserves the spray canners’ feeble “art”.