Uh, oh...My numbers up

I’ve come to realize that one of my Proto 2000 locomotives has an incorrect number board - i.e. NYC didn’t make a diesel with that number. (LifeLike: Bad dog!) I have an NYC Alco S1 #687. NYC S1s roster numbers started with #811

http://www.thedieselshop.us/Alco_S1.HTML

How difficult is it to replace a translucent number board on a Proto 2000 so that it still lights up when the LED shines through the headlight? Is that something that would have to be scratch-built? Or, are there aftermarket number boards available for doing that? Thanks!

Tom

Uh oh.
I’m very eager to hear the answer, yet I have no idea myself.

I want to renumber a P2k S2/1 (don’t remember if they make a B&M S2, i really hope they do) as unit 1271. In the 70’s/80’s it served in Deerfield Yard, one of only 2 S Units left on the B&M roster.

Oops! [:I] Looks like I spoke a little soon. I was able to find #687 on another Diesel Shop web page entitle: New York Central Motive Power Summery:

http://www.thedieselshop.us/NYC.HTML

* * * YARD SWITCHERS * * *
Last Road Number - 9404-9410
Original Number - 685-690, 692
Builder & Model - Alco Alco S-1
Notes - Ex 950-955, 957; exx 900-905, 907

Even so, I’d still like to know if and how it can be done.

Tom

Sorry, wrong number.[swg]

I couldn’t resist.

you must be really a prototipacally modeler if you want the correct numbers for your locos!!! Yoshi-in N scale LL mkaes a Hobby quality Sw8 switcher in B&M colers. I am getting it for X-Mas to work 1 of my yards.

Prototypical, within reason. I like to be as accurate as I can - e.g. actual locomoitves and rolling stock in my era. But I don’t sit around and count my own rivets. It’s fun and more believable to me…

Tom

Exactly, i’m just like tstage in this instance.

Loco 1271 is rather special to me, and since my dream layout includes Deerfield Yard, this loco will be 100% essential.

I decaled 2 F units in Cp rail colors.When it came to the numbers on the sides and on the boards, I picked 4 #'s that were in a row on the decal sheet. (they were in random order instead of the proper1234567…) They weren’t even close to the proper # series for F units in CP, but there’s NO WAY I could have gotten 4 seperate numbers applied straight. It bugs ME every time I look at them, but I know 99.9% of the people would never catch it. If I had to do it again, I’d use dry tranfers for the #'s.
(P.S.-I didn’t mean to tick you off on that other post)