SpaceMouse,
I don’t know if I’ve ever counted rivets for real, but I’m a stickler at times for what I consider “right” for my own models. Just don’t tell me that a model of yours is an exact replica of a New Haven locomotive…because then I’ll look for what’s wrong and tell you. [:)]
I don’t like roundy-rounder layouts. To me, it’s totally boring…not unlike watching paint dry, but to each their own. Just don’t try an tell me that you are accurately re-creating XYZ road on such-and-such a date, because I’ll tell you why you aren’t.
Hating non-staged layouts? Who would hate a layout?
I don’t weather my models too often. I like to change eras, and once you start weathering equipment, you are locking yourself into a specific time frame that you can’t escape from unless you have a lot of stuff, weathered and unweathered.
As for DC & DCC, I’ve done both. DCC is for me, but DC’s ok…just don’t try to pretend that DC gives one better/more realistic performance.
What does “skoof” mean?
As far as the rest goes, I’ll keep my trap shut on just about anything if my opinion is not asked. However, if one tries to present oneself as an expert on a RR (or it’s equipment) or in an era and then presents bogus info, then I’ll try to gently correct them.
For example, a fellow I met at a local RR meeting presented an MBTA F40PH and proclaimed that it was an accurate model. Well, I couldn’t let that go because 1) it was the wrong number, 2) it was the wrong color, and 3) it had dynamics when it’s not supposed to. So I told him. He took it well.
For another example, I saw this guy’s layout this year that was beautiful…built in the 1950’s, it was a real roundy-round layout with great scenery, but not much in the operations part. But the topper was that the guy was still using X2F horn-hook couplers. This gentleman actually makes his own brass steam engines from scratch, yet th