I used to use a generic El Cheapo plain vanilla word-processing program.
A couple of years ago, my wife got me Microsoft Office Word because she wanted to get me something I could use in working on my Masters degree, writing papers, articles. I use the “table” feature of Word.
I am prototype oriented-- I think of what my models would represent in the virtual world of my railroad, rather than the model manufacturer, catalog number, purchase price, etc. So I have a separate page for each type freight car, box, flat, gondola, hopper, covered hopper, ice, logging, reefer, stock, tank, caboose, maintenance of way, passenger cars, and locomotives.
Isn’t that odd, compared to most model railroaders, I think of locomotives last? They are merely what pulls the train. It is the cars that make up its operating “personality”.
My column holes for my freight car pages are:
Roadname initial (ATSF, GATX etc)
Car number
AAR mechanical designation (XM, FD, LO, etc)
Car class as assigned by railroad company (ie BX-52 for Santa Fe)
“Marking/appearance” Identifying marks that are easily visible other than the official reporting marks such as “Grand Canyon” billboard marking on the said of a Santa Fe house car, or big “Gulf” lettering on the said of a tankcar whose official owner mark is WRNX. Where there is no big lettering or unique logo, I might use car color such as “black” in that hole.)
Description (of the car design type. For boxcars for instance, 40’AAR1937 or PS-1 or “wagontop” or “USRA SSh” for a circa 1919 single-sheathed wood body car of US Railroad Administration standard design.)
Authen? “Yes”; “CusPix” meaning it has been custom detailed to match a dated prototype photo, “60s paint” meaning I really want to repaint it before using it on my middle-1950s layout, or a very short description.
Coupler: MT (MicroTrains), Rap(Rapido), Mate(one of the “other” brands that wil