Folks:
Just the other day I saw a Kalmbach publication with this title at the LHS. I leafed through it; it was a very good book on modeling that decade.
However, the title got me to thinking. It’s eye-catching, but it just isn’t correct. Colorful and eye-catching, the 1950s were, and interesting for us to model, but by no stretch of the term were they a golden age.
Economically, they were was the beginning of the end. We began losing our first marginal Class 1s, and the programs of highway building were quickly eating away traffic. Everything was in decline, and the stage wasn’t just set for the horrific 1960s and 1970s,the play was already starting. (As it turned out, the “end” wasn’t as final as had been feared, and we have a prosperous rail network again…skeletal, but profitable…)
Even disregarding that, the zenith had passed. When you look at a railroad, you see a lot of 1910 infrastructure. Go back to the 1950s and read the magazines. There’s a lot of forward-thinking innovation, but under it there’s a lot of retrenchment: closing towers, closing stations, abandoned branches, yards and repair shops being shut down.
The glory days of steam were gone. There was still steam running, yes, but to really see steam locomotives in their prime, you almost have to go back before the war, and preferably no later than the 1930s. Fifties steam, with some exceptions like the N & W, was a thing of more pathos than majesty; dirty and neglected 4-8-4s on local freights, noble Hudsons on passenger protection, dead steam lined up, steam being scrapped.
Even the scenery was changing. Many of the features we like best about that decade were actually carry-overs from earlier times. Many of the worst vulgarities of our age are very much a 1950s product. Elegant brick buildings were being sheathed in ugly tin or demolishe