It’s a defective attempt to build a SD70MACH using an unsuitable frame and throwing out most of the 70-series electronics. I don’t think you can cavalierly sling HTCR trucks under a SD40 the way you could by switching toy sideframes.
Maybe he could dig up an old IC SD40A? I wonder if any of those odd beasts are still around? I remember catching one in Springfield, IL back in the early 90’s. Looked ginormous.
Ask the Interwebs a question and it usually has an answer - IC 6014 is still around.
Well I DID forget to mention its just a test bed and I’m still deciding on whether to use the 20-645 or put it on the SDP45 frame as a few of you guys mentioned, but I’m for sure designating it SDL70MAC since its a supposed to be shorter SD70MAC Series locomotive
And I forgot to mention in the beginning that the frame will be heavily modified to accommodate all the modifications, and the frame is also reinforced to fit the weight of the 16-710G3A
The “L” stands for “Light” in EMD terms. That’s why the SDL39 has the lighter export trucks and a 12 cylinder engine instead of the 16 in the 38/40.
Since it’s just an elevation drawing on a computer, what difference what’s in the hood make?
I don’t quite see the point of a shorter SD70 if you’re going to use a SDP45 frame. Just section the SD70 frame that your parts came on. It’s a weldment already, so no fabrication surprises.
I’d use the Mercedes-Benz letter ‘K’ (for ‘kurz’ which means ‘short’) because ‘light’ is NOT something that characterizes that locomotive design.
Looks interesting, to say the least. One question though - How can it be an EMD MAC model with a spartan type cab? M means safety cab equipped. Also, for the SD50S, EMD used the letter S to denote locos built on short frames. I believe the SD50S’ were SD50 testbeds built on SD40-2 frames.