With all this discussion about safety at crossings, protecting the innocent from the mean, old railroads, and such, i would like to say something to Missouri and the others so worried about this subject.
It seems to be the practice these days to legislate stupidity. Four-quadrant gates, multiple lights, visual clearances of hundreds of feet, etc. Is this how we protect the stupid? Whatever happened to a person being responsible for their own actions, and the consequences thereof? The government, nor any individual, can idiot-proof the world; nor should they try. If someone is so stupid to go around gates, or ignore flashing lights, or walk on railroad tracks, then they alone should be responsible for the results. If they get killed, then that is one less idiot in the gene pool to pass on his/her stupidity to the next generation. Darwin’s theory will prove itself. We will rid ourselves of traits that are not conducive to survival.
And if this seems a bit cold to someone, observe how we as a culture are becoming more stupid each year. Look at liability disclaimers on products:
WARNING: HOT COFFEE. MAY CAUSE BURNS.
WARNING: PRODUCT MAY BE HOT WHEN REMOVED FROM OVEN.
WARNING: EXCESSIVE HEIGHT VEHICLE. MAY ROLL OVER.
WARNING: DO NOT TOUCH EXPOSED WIRES, ELECTROCUTION POSSIBLE.
and so on and so on. I mean, come on. How DUH is all that?
Our culture has become so lawyer-intensive that we have become incapable of thinking for ourselves; I wonder where it will end? Someone in a post mentioned loud radios and cell phones as reasons we have to protect their stupidity. I say if they are so brain-dead as to not be aware of the dangers of isolating oneself from one’s environment, then let them move on to the next level. I bet when they are in an ambulance, dying from a heart-attack, they will hope the other drivers are paying attention to their surroundings, so they can get out of his way on his trip to the hospital!
During my 20 y