Dry Transfer vs. Decals - Pros and Cons?

I have four Stewart-Kato F units in SP Black Widow. All were sold without road numbers. Nice that I get to choose but a tad inconvenient as I have to do the job. I thought a couple days ago about using dry transfer numbers (if indeed they are available in Espee for for their BW locos). Thinking that I could dispense with the decal overlap between the numbers and that goofs might be easier to fix. But I don’t know as I’ve never used them. And it’s been a looong time since I did any decaling.

Please weigh in on both sides, folks. And also confirm that the cover/seal procedure is the same for both.

Thanks!

John

I think the SP font is Railroad Roman, either dry transfer or decals would work. I prefer decals but then again I make my own decals on my Alps printer.

I usually set them up using Word and print at least a half page at a time. For instance I would go to the ESPEE Railfan site and add as many locomotive equipment numbers that I think I might use over time into Word then print out 8 to 10 or so of each equipment number (plenty of spares), sure beats single numbers at a time. I do the same for “Southern Pacific Lines” in several sizes.

http://espee.railfan.net/spf03ab.html

I keep the unused decals in an envelope for future use.

This is Railroad Roman font

I use Micro Scale Set and SOL for my decals then seal them with Testors Dullcote.

I use both decals and dry transfers, and both have their good and not-so-good points.

The first three sets of custom lettering I had made by C-D-S were for my freelanced road. The dry transfers should be applied on a matte surface, for best adhesion, and once applied and properly burnished, should be oversprayed with a clear, flat or semi-gloss finish - I prefer Dulcote, applied with an airbrush, but will add a little Glosscote if the model is meant to represent a newer car or locomotive.

The benefits of dry transfers is that they have no “halo” of clear film around them, as decals do, and the transferred images are more opaque than many decals, so the lettering appears more like it was actually painted-on.

The drawbacks of dry transfers include the one-shot you’re allowed to get it right: if you apply the lettering crooked, you can easily remove the mess with some masking tape, but it is not re-useable like a decal. It’s also difficult to apply dry transfers to irregular surfaces - careful burnishing can make a dry transfer cover rivets as well as does paint, but things like boxcar ends require a fair amount of diligence. Strong decal setting solutions, such as Solvaset, work well on dry transfers, too, a useful fact to keep in mind.

Dry transfers, properly stored have a pretty good shelf life, but can dry-out over time, rendering them useless.

For application on irregular surfaces, I usually apply the lettering to clear decal paper, burnish it well, then cut it out and apply it like any regular decal. If you overspray it, before cutting it from the sheet, with a clear finish to protect the lettering, it will make the decal difficult to settle, even if you’re using a strong setting solution. Leave it uncoated until it’s applied, then add the clear finish.

When lettering the ends of cars and locomotives, I’ve found it beneficial to place the item in a heavy glass beer mug, wit

I was going to reply, but Wayne’s excellent post said everything, and I even learned a little bit.

.

I love these forums.

.

-Kevin

.

Thanks, Wayne. Once again, an upper-level class in a single post.

You da man.

John

Thanks for your kind words, guys. I’ve had lots of time to make mistakes, which provided lots of learning experiences.

Wayne

I’ve been planning a railroad for a while now and I am just about ready to start construction. Been lurking here for a few years soaking up the knowledge that Dr. Wayne, Kevin, RR_Mel, Sheldon and many others freely pass down. Thanks to all of you. I know I will make mistakes as I go along, but I trust they will be fewer because of your shared experiences.

.

It is very good to hear that I am helping out, but I don’t know if I would listen to me too much.

.

I am very good at three or four things, and kind of muddle my way through everything else.

.

-Kevin

.

Yes, Wayne has covered this pretty well, my methods are much like his, although my use of dry transfers is pretty limited these days.

My photo skills are not as good as Wayne, but here is some of my decal work:

All of these models are yet to be lightly weathered, and a few still needed a final clear coat when these pictures were taken.

Seeker_CNY, thank you for the kind words.

Kevin, don’t sell yourself short. Your methods are sometimes unconventional, just as many of mine are unconventional or sort of “revised old school”, but your work speaks for itself as top shelf.

Sheldon