That was John Sing’s compact N scale layout, long since dismantled when he relocated. The locomotive was entirely fictional.
The photos below don’t reflect the improvements in scenery John made over the years. An internet search for “John Sing N scale” will return many references:
[Edited post - I stand corrected, quite rightly. FM produced the Train Master. A trainmaster is a person holding a particular railroad job with a particular title. My mistake. I have changed my posting below accordingly. DN]
Intriguing because Fairbanks Morse had reportedly done some design work and planning for something very like a “super Train Master” before they decided to exit the locomotive market. Supposedly someone who worked for F-M “saved” the plans before retiring and I have talked to guys who claim to have seen them. But of course that is how rumors start (or end).
When I toured the F-M factory a couple of years ago (part of a Chicago & North Western Historical Society meet in Beloit WI) it is evident they remain aware, and proud, of their railroad heritage. And it’s interesting that they bought the rights to make Alco 251 engines (not locomotives, engines) and still offer them for marine purposes. So in a sense, Alco lives, in Beloit WI.
In their visitor center (the only place where photos were allowed) they have cut away versions of both the F-M opposed piston and the Alco 251 showing how they work. Lots of railroad photos on the walls, and the old factory buildings themselves are fascinating.
Since the referenced link about the Super Train Master doesn’t work and you have given us a tid bit about the engine…can you or someone give us some information about the engine? Having ridden TM’s on the Virginian Ry back in the 1950’s I can attest to them being awesome locomotives and wonder what would have improved them to elevate to “super” status?
I’m guessing that the reason it was “fictional” is only because the Santa Fe never owned any Trainmasters.
The reference to a “Super Trainmaster” in the thread title is somewhat confusing to me, as it’s not mentioned until Dave Nelson’s post on a proposed prototype of such a beast.
After watching the video in DrW’s link, and not being at all familiar with the capabilities of N scale locomotives, I’m wondering if a locomotive pulling 18 cars would be considered “super”.
And that was a very nice layout for its size it was one of my favorite small N Scale layouts since it wasn’t over tracked like the majority of similar size layouts…
Gidday Roger, this is an abbreviated version of what I’ve found from scratching around the internet, unfortunately some of the links that appeared more promising have disappeared into the ether.
Here’s an imagined drawing of a H-33-66 Super Trainmaster that looks like the one in DrW s video link.
However, there is one reference, though somewhat contradictory, that suggests, in one Fairbanks Morse sourced drawing, (which Dave N refers too) that they were to look something like an Alco RSD15 “Alligator”, while in the second drawing, a pug nose, something like the GE U boats.
Apparently the fictionalised Super Trainmaster was powered by a 20 cylinder engine producing either 3500 or 3600 horsepower.
Many people overlook the fact that many Fairbanks Morse 38D8-1/8 engines were built in Russia, after a US Coast Guard Icebreaking ship, fitted with four such engines, was loaned to the Soviet Union during WWII. The story goes that the ship actually ran with three engines while in Russian hands while the fourth engine was away being copied.
I suspect that many more FM opposed piston engines were built in Russia and the Ukraine than in Wisconsin. One class of locomotive, the 2TE-10 (two units with turbocharged ten cylinder engines) numbered around 7300 locomotives, so 14600 units, more than any single EMD type.
So the Russians had plenty of Super Trainmasters, even if they didn’t look much like the US version.