Alco is still being used by a dozen or so short line RR. So other then butchering existing locos who makes parts for these beasts?
DLW in India still produces new parts (and at least up until a couple of years ago, complete locomotives), and Fairbanks-Morse still makes 251 engines.
New parts are still around.
As of 21 March 2018, DLW are still building Alco locomotives:
This is a DL535, known in India as a YDM4.
It is generally similar to the DL535s supplied by Alco and MLW to the White Pass and Yukon, but has microprocessor control and a new dynamic brake installation in the short hood.
Myanmar is generally better known as Burma…
The DF prefix indicates a six motor locomotive.
Peter
Thanks. The last one I had heard about was the 2016-built Myanmar units.
FM bought the Alco 251 series. They produce them, and sell parts…
FM was smart to acquire the 251 design. The 251 engine still sees a fair amount of use in stationary and marine applications.
Many parts were bough from suppliers, the electrical gear as the best example. Just because the erector went out of business didn’t mean the supplier did, also.
As a deliberate policy, the Indian government adopted the Alco design because Alco were willing to licence the construction of the whole locomotive including the diesel engine. EMD would not allow licence construction of the engine, and missed out on the long term orders.
To be honest, while GT16 was probably at least as good as the DL560, maybe better, the GA12C was a clumsy adaptation of the GA8. It didn’t help that the DL535 was one Alco’s best products, high power (1200HP) from the 6-251D, assisted by air to air intercooling (as used on recent GE T3 and T4 engines). There is a reason that they are still building DL 535s for sale this year.
It seems that India went with the British AEI equipment rather than GE. AEI incorporated GE’s British subsidiary British Thomson Houston. It is pbably worth recalling that the “tom” in Alstom, originally Alsthom, came from Thomson Houston too.
AEI often adopted new features, better insulation, earlier than GE.
Turbochargers from Napier and ABB are used in place of the old Alco designs.
These Indian products could keep US Alcos running for many years to come…
Peter
I take it that AEI is/was a electrical equipment manufacturer.
To North American railroaders the initials “AEI” stand for Automatic Equipment Identification, that is the RFID tags on rolling stock and trackside scanners.
AEI stood for Associated Electrical Industries
(or just to be confusing, in Australia, for a while, Australian Electrical Industries, using the same brand logo… until the English name was used in Australia)
I think AEI was the result of the merger of British Thomson-Houston (as noted above) and Metropolitan Vickers, another British electrical company with origins in the Metropolitan Carriage and Wagon Company and Vickers, the shipbuilder and armament manufacturer. M-V were tied up with Beyer Peacock as well…
This merged later with the General Electric Company (no relation at all to the USA GE, that was BT-H, remember) to form GEC-AEI, and later just GEC again. About then English Electric was taken over as well. That GEC merged with Alsthom or Alstom depending on when it happened.
Confusing the letters is the least of your problem.
But as Associated Electrical Industries, it supplied a lot of equipment for Alco powered locomotives designed by both Alco and MLW.
Peter
Look at it this way, if there’s a demand for parts, and a need for parts, someone, somewhere is going to fill that need. That’s what capitalism’s all about.
Not quite the same thing, but pick up a copy of “Hemmings Motor News” sometime and look at all the ads for new-manufactured aftermarket parts for automobile restorers, all makes and models and time periods. It’ll amaze you. It amazed me!
I always heard “someone” bought out Alco’s parts department and has a warehouse or two of genuine ALCO parts, if one is inclined to pay for them. (as an example, I know a guy who has a warehouse full of P51 parts. He keeps two or three flying as playthings.)
didn’t also also use lot of gm/emd designs/parts in their electrical systems?
Alco and MLW used GE electrical equipment right till the end, though MLW/BBD tried other suppliers, I think Hitachi was one.
Cheers
Steve
NZ
NRE - Mt. Vernon IL is still a supplier (Take a look at the NRE/PNE/C&EI Shops roof)
thanks, remember reading something about the alco doc rebuilding a century series and he mentioned how electrical runs were built. must have mixed up ge and gm in my mind.
I’ve never heard of any Alco/MLW/BBD locomotive with Hitachi electrical equipment.
The two locomotives illustrated in my photo in the recent Trackside “Numbers” entry were fitted with Mitsubihi equipment.
The locomotives built in France for North Korea and Iraq had French electrical equipment. At least those built for Iraq had Alco 16-251 engines. I’m not sure about the North Korean units.
I’ve mentioned elsewhere about British AEI equipment in Australian and Indian units. But I think all North American units used GE equipment.
Peter
The Bombardier - Hitachi joint venture produced export only models in the early 1980’s, according to the Steinbrenner book. My assumption that these locomotives used Hitachi electrical equipment may be incorrect.
Cheers
Steve
NZ
I can’t recall for certain who supplied the electrical equipment when the lone MLW M640 (CP 4744) was converted in 1984 to A1A trucks with four AC traction motors replacing the original six GE751 DC motors. Hitachi may have been one of the partners in that experimental precursor to AC traction in North American freight diesels. The 4744 ran in that condition at least until 1991 so it seems to have been moderately successful, albeit not repeated.
John
I checked Steinbrenner’s book. Page 462 I think.
I don’t think any locomotives were built under the joint MLW-Hitachi arrangement.
However, a number of Hitachi design locomotives were built with Alco engines for use in Pakistan and Bangladesh. Technically these aren’t MLW or Alco locomotives with Hitachi equipment, but in the great scheme of things they should be counted as Alcos even if they don’t look as expected.
Peter