Dave, I think there is a clear line being established here as to what needs seperate insurance and what does not. In the case of your car collection, I think the term “investment grade” applies. You buy them to display them because you like them, but deep down you hope that their value increases. They are not to be played with, and are not “toys” (for lack of a better term).
You suffered a loss, and filed a claim for $350. You said earlier that your annual premium was $100. At that rate, if you had your policy for 4 years, and if they paid the claim in full, the company has made a good bet so far, because they are still $50 ahead based on the guess of a 4 year term.
In the past, here on the forum, we have discussed the collectability of HO and N scale trains, and have pretty much concluded that, with the exception of brass and some of the older pieces, they are not collectable. Regardless of what you paid for it, most of it replacable at pennies on the dollar in used condition.
Sentimental value is a different story. Just think of all the photo albums and one of a kind items that have ever been lost in fires or natural disasters. They are gone forever, and with little or no compensation. That is what a layout is, with all of it’s buildings, scenery, and wiring.
When you tear down a layout to move, you salvage what you can, mostly structures and trains. The rest is trash, no matter how many hours went into it’s creation. I think the best you can hope for is a fraction of the raw material cost.
On the other hand, I have some friends who collect Lionel trains. The basement of their tiny home is like a museum. The value of their trains far exceedes the value of the structure and the rest of it’s contents. They have insurance, and rightfully so, but then they aren’t in what I would consider the norm for this forum’s audience.
I think it would be safe to say that 90% of the magazine’s audience are not candidates for this kind of special cov