Sheldon,
I know you don’t model the UP, but I wasn’t talking necessarily about your situation, rather in general about those who have home roads. For example, I helped sell off an estate collection from an old time model railroader who did his own northeast-based home road. He was big into steam, and his home roster included PRR, ATSF, UP, NYC, Union RR, D&H, SP, RDG, D&RGW, SP&S, etc. with an emphasis on articulateds (including a 2-10-10-2).
The modern day “steam reniassance” in HO scale goes back to the original Bachmann Spectrum 2-8-0, which was MR’s product of the year in 1998. The Spectrum USRA Light Mountain came out in 1999 and the movement was on.
There is no way there was more available variety in 2007 than today. There’s been so much steam made in the past 10 years, how can there be less variety?
BLI steam is highly accurate…for the expensive versions. If you’re complaining about their generic USRA steamers, that’s how they keep the costs $50 to $150 lower. They aren’t going to change those. And, BTW, neither does Bachmann. My Spectrum USRA 4-8-2 in NH should have Commonwealth tender trucks, but has Vulcans instead.
You hate the hunt for product? Well, what did you do 30 years ago? How did you hunt something that didn’t exist?
Doughless,
I doubt that production resources are a problem in regards to production numbers. Getting it made at all can be trouble (see: Atlas), but once a factory is found and a contract signed, the amount of items made doesn’t make much difference to the factory (at least in model railroad terms; we’re talking thousands not millions). Whether they make 3000 or 6000 units, it won’t effect factory capacity. So expanding one product run really doesn’t effect another’s run. It might delay it, but it won’t take away anything