Krauss-Maffei ML-4000

Afternoon everyone,

Just wanted to discuss an Interesting import locomotive that was on Southern Pacific’s & Denver, Rio Grande & Western’s Roster in the 60s, known as the Krauss-Maffei ML-4000, the Niles Canyon Railway, The unit undergone a 11-Year restoration with ‘New’ trucks reconditioned for the unit as the original ones on the C-C unit were inoperable, It remains operable today with it looking like it did back in the 60s

Here is a video of the Operational ML-4000 in 2019, Video by Ben Wang

What do you all think of the KM ML-4000?

There were 2 models of the KM ML-4000: a standard hood unit and a covered hood unit, like the EMD F and E-Units


SP 9010 KM ML-4000 - Hood Variant
Credits: Jamie West

DRGW 4002 KM ML-4000 - Covered Hood Variant
Credits: Sam Beck

Any other information regarding the restoration of the locomotive can be found here on the Trains blog post

Here’s the overview too if needed (its essentially the blog post):

Niles Canyon’s restored Southern Pacific Krauss-Maffei diesel to debut in July, NEWSWIRE

By Angela Cotey | January 10, 2019 | Last updated on November 3, 2020


9010 receives its “new” used truck repatriated from France. Pictured, from left, are Rich Alexander, SP 9010 Lead Machinist Bill Stimmerman and Dennis Mann, all PLA volunteers.
Robert Zenk

Volunteer Rob Fern and SP 9010 Restoration Crew Chief Howard P. Wise look over some of their work.
Robert Zenk

The once and future 9010 looked like this in 2008 when it was acquired by the Pacific Locomotive Association from the California State Railroad Museum.
Howard P. Wise
BRIGHTSIDE, Calif. — It’s been more than 50 years since Southern Pacific’s mechanically distinctive, odd-looking Krauss-Maffei diesel-hydraulic locomotives rolled through Niles Canyon southeast of San Francisco, but a homecoming is on the horizon for July when the last such locomotive in existence is scheduled to make its first public runs on the Pacific Locomotive Association’s Niles Canyon Railway.
The association’s restoration work on No. 9010, the last survivor of 37 German-built Krauss-Maffei ML 4000 C’C’ diesel-hydraulic locomotives in the United States and Brazil, is nearing completion, and will be mostly finished when the locomotive makes its official inaugural runs July 20-21.

These first runs, following an 11-year restoration effort, will be part of a series of celebrations of the 150th anniversary of the driving of the Golden Spike in Utah, marking formal completion of the Transcontinental Railroad. The Niles Canyon Railway operates a 10-mile segment of the original transcontinental line linking Sacramento to the Bay area.

At 3,540 h.p. at the rail, the Krauss Maffei diesel hydraulics — each with two 16-cylinder Maybach Mercedes-Benz MD 870 diesel power plants — provided more heft than conventional diesel locomotives from American builders could offer in the early 1960s in the midst of U.S. railroading’s horsepower wars. Three carbody units and 15 road-switcher versions were bought new by SP; Denver and Rio Grande Western bought three carbody versions, which were later sold to SP.

Unlike typical diesel locomotives that use generators and electric motors to transmit power from the prime mover to the wheels, diesel hydraulics like SP 9010 have “automatic” transmissions, universal drive shafts, and geared axles.

No. 9010 was delivered in Spring 1964. It and the other KMs were regulars on what No. 9010 PLA volunteer Robert Zenk called “the triangle,” operating between maintenance bases in Bayshore (near San Francisco), Roseville (near Sacramento), and turnarounds at Fresno or Bakersfield in the San Joaquin Valley. During their early years of operation, the KMs regularly traversed the Lathrop-Tracy-Niles line over Altamont Pass; the Niles Canyon Railway’s trackage is part of that latter route.

When successful higher-horsepower diesels were introduced by American builders in the mid-60s, the KM’s days were numbered. All of SP’s units, both the carbodies and road-switchers, were removed from regular service in 1968, but No. 9010 (already renumbered by then to No. 9113) was kept for use as a “camera car” to make films used in locomotive simulators for training locomotive crews. Zenk said that the structure of No. 9113’s nose, plus the ability to use part of the front engine compartment to store camera equipment, made the K-M a good candidate for this work. It was reconfigured, and renumbered No. 8799.

The unit was retired from camera car service in 1984, and donated to the California State Railroad Museum in 1986. It languished for several years before PLA acquired it in 2008. Restoration work started the next year, under the direction of PLA volunteer Howard P. Wise.

Zenk said several members of the organization were in Sacramento looking at pieces being de-accessed by the museum when they ran across No. 8799, “a cabless, doorless rusted hulk,” Zenk said. A young PLA volunteer on this trip was first to recognize this hulk’s importance.

“He said, ‘This is a very significant piece of American railroad mechanical history — we’ve got to save this,’” Zenk related. That it operated during its service life over what is now the PLA’s Niles Canyon Railway made the acquisition that much more relevant, Zenk said.

The rear engine needed a thorough cleaning, and a fair amount of ancillary work, including new fueling and cooling systems and radiators and new driveshafts. But Zenk said it was surprisingly straightforward to get the engine to turn over, given it had been idle since 1968, which meant its restoration would be possible and practical. That No. 2 engine still needs a rebuild of the top end, he said, which will happen sometime after its July debut.

The front No. 1 engine, which was more exposed to the elements during its long hibernation than was the No. 2 engine, cannot practically be brought back to life, Zenk said. But the locomotive is operable with one engine.

The locomotive has also undergone a complete cab rebuild, a re-fabrication of its hood and pilot, installation of a “new” used C-C rear truck repatriated from France and a restoration to its 1964 appearance.

The last remaining significant work, Zenk said, will be the rebuild of the top of the engine, Zenk said, as well as installation of a hydraulic pump to drive cooling fans.

Those wishing to donate to the 9010’s ongoing preservation efforts can go to donate.htm. Informational sites detailing the 9010’s preservation efforts can be found at http://sp9010.ncry.org and Redirecting...

Credit to Trains Magazine and Angela Cotey (@Angela_Cotey) for the blog post provided

3 Likes

This is one of the very best works of preservation in the United States, made even more significant with the care taken to restore the European components like the window frames with correct material.

Zenk wrote one of the definitive works on the K-Ms, which has just had a second edition and does not require the extortionate price that has up until recently been charged by the usual-suspects profiteering ‘rare book dealers’.

4 Likes

Perhaps the biggest reason that the K-M’s didn’t last very long was that the units required a more intense maintenance protocol than domestic diesel-electrics. In addition, EMD and GE put effort into making more rugged traction motors along with using traction alternators. The SD-45 had roughly the same drawbar HP as the K-M’s with a single engine (prime mover).

3 Likes

I love this story and the locomotives. I bought 1 of each of the DCC versions





Piko recently released. They are magnificent models and have the actual recording of the Dual MB diesels.

3 Likes

I’ve got an AHM K-M in Espee colors that I bought in 1968 - shudder to think how many decades have passed since last running it. BTW, the wheels are definitely not rp25 profiles.

2 Likes

I like the horn that SP K-M ML-4000 9010 has, it gives it its own unique voice :heart_eyes:, not like most diesels today have that because most of the horns are almost identical :roll_eyes:

1 Like

Gabe, for those who UNFORTUNATELY did not witness the KM’s when SP active, what did the horn sound like? (Woke’s comment about it’s use as a switcher, Reverse Issue…Can’t you see the face of hoghead… waiting to move backward).
A recent online video of the refurbished KM showed it moving and IIRC it did sound for a grade crossing. I wonder if in the refurb, it had ORIGINAL horn or common present day type? endmrw0424241048

That’s what I meant by the horn it seems to be the original horn or a replica of the original horn

1 Like

Thanks, now I will need to find that video of the KM restoration. Seems to be a clip from news or something. Certainly the restoration is a big newsworthy event. When found, sound UP (up = LOUD not Uncle Pete LOL) at the end of the clip (grade crossing is near) endmrw0425251142

Just searched how to spell Krauss Maffei. Bingo, the video with sound at the beginning of the clip had the horn sound. I know the’re groups who have sole interest in air horns. They even have meets to show off their “toys”. But to me the KM sounds like most others. To me the NS horn seems different than most. DON"T ask me what model air horn it is. It to me, sound different than most. endmrw0425251229

Gabe, Hopefully Woke will check in on this matter. I am NOT an aficionado of air horns. Woke will probably know the frequency of horns (probably several frequencies to make the distinctive sound). Personally I would like to know about particulars on NS loco horns. endmrw0424251942

1 Like

Here’s a bit from KM author Robert Zenk:

https://sp9010.ncry.org/spmods.htm

He says the locomotives were originally built with Nathan P3s… or more precisely, P14-R2/6

Page

I make a lousy foamer as I have little interest in what locomotives have what whistles or horns. I’d find out from Web sources if I wanted exact details… of course that process is getting harder, not easier, and becoming more fraught with peril of incorrect information, as the fake-AI ‘revolution’ proceeds…