Those poor guys in LS or “G” gauge.
We are back to the old failure of gauge and scale and the seemingly endless profusion of misrepresentations and manufacturers re-inventing things.
I have sort of personally given up on understanding LS. First, I’m not in it and never will be even though I admire the finer detailing possibilities. Second, any really lovely and well executed steam loco in the scale is about 4-10 times more costly that of the most expensive DCC non-brass HO engines and many of the best detailed cars are about the price of a nice DCC HO engine.
Gauge is about track separation. Within this gauge you are looking at the U.S. standard gauge “scale” and this then determines the equivalent 3 foot, 21/2 foot and 2 foot gauge separations.
I prefer to refer to “Scale” HO scale, O scale,etc. Here, we establish a fixed ratio between the size of the model and real life equivalent. In fixing a scale, forever, we force a “track gauge”, (rail separation), into existence!
The convention is that the country’s standard gauge is the real scale proportions and are forced to narrow the separation of the rails to simply stay in scale for all narrow gauges within the fixed scale.
For N, HO, S and O, (fixed scales), there are all manner of narrow gauges denoted by the n# following the scale designation. HOn3, Sn21/2,etc.
For LS there seems to be a free for all of scales revolving about a 45mm gauge!! Backwards and silly to my mind. Surely it will all shake out like VHS vs. Beta with an ultimate winner, one would hope.
Question… Is the NMRA involved in this? If they are and have firmly set LS scales, do the manufacturers care? LS needs to get their collective act together.
Suppose some idiot manufacturer created 1:98 scale and it ran on HO track or N track. How long would that last today?
Richard